The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Religious Research
Abstract
The Review of Religious Research (RRR) publishes empirical social science research on religion, primarily in sociology and social psychology and related ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure
Blau, P. M. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,792
Featherman, D. L., & Hauser, R. M. (1978) · Cited by 1,273
Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain
Goldthorpe, J. H., Llewellyn, C., & Payne, C. D. (1980) · Cited by 1,170
Gesammelte Aufsätze 0 zur Religionssoziologie
Weber, M. (2025) · Mohr Siebeck eBooks · doi:10.1628/978-3-16-169357-1 · Cited by 886
(1979) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-22052-6 · Cited by 704
Nisbet, R. A. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315135052 · Cited by 670
Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations
Blau, P. M., & Schwartz, J. E. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 628
A general model for multivariate analysis
Finn, J. D. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 448
Choosing Models for Cross-Classifications
Raftery, A. E. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095483 · Cited by 428
Cited by
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764010380927 · Cited by 1,503
Theorizing Religious Effects Among American Adolescents
Smith, C. (2003) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/1468-5906.t01-1-00158 · Cited by 688
The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721413510932 · Cited by 432
God-Mediated Control and Change in Self-Rated Health
Krause, N. (2010) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2010.507695 · Cited by 110
Religiousness, Religious Doubt, and Death Anxiety
Henrie, J., & Patrick, J. H. (2014) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/ag.78.3.a · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Venue
- Review of Religious Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-06-14
- ISSN
- 0034-673X (ISSN-L)
- 2211-4866
- OpenAlex
- W2291832666
- Cited by
- 1,157
- References
- 14
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Religious Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/13644.2211-4866
- The paper
- Review of Religious Research. (2023). Review of Religious Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/13644.2211-4866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
