Cited by 432Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentAcademic Freedom and Politics

The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance Among Both Liberals and Conservatives

Brandt, Mark J., Reyna, Christine, Chambers, John R., Crawford, Jarret T., Wetherell, Geoffrey·2014·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Decades of research in social and political psychology have demonstrated that political conservatives appear more intolerant toward a variety of groups than do political liberals. Recent work from our three independent labs has challenged this conventional wisdom by suggesting that some of the psychological underpinnings of intolerance are not exclusive to people on either end of the political spectrum. These studies have demonstrated that liberals and conservatives express similar levels of intolerance toward ideologically dissimilar and threatening groups. We suggest directions for future research and discuss the psychological and political implications of our conclusions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721413510932

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By challenging official narratives, conspiracy theories can undermine people's trust in broader societal structures, leading to alienation and anomie, which is linked to non-normative political activism.

    “by challenging official narratives conspiracy theories can actually undermine people's trust in broader societal structures [cf.56] leading to alienation and anomie [10-12, 57, 58] which in turn is linked to non-normative political activism [17**,18].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G.
Affiliations
  • Tilburg University (NL)
  • DePaul University (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • The College of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2014-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
27-34
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2146237990
Cited by
432
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
93.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit van Tilburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Academic Freedom and Politics
Keywords
political intolerance, intergroup attitudes, political ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review