The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microscopic Traffic Simulation using SUMO
Lopez, P. A., Wiessner, E., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flotterod, Y.-P., Hilbrich, R., Lucken, L., Rummel, J., & Wagner, P. (2018) · 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2018.8569938 · Cited by 3,297
Self-citation(2012) · elib (German Aerospace Center) · Cited by 1,994
Punzo, V., Borzacchiello, M. T., & Ciuffo, B. (2011) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.007 · Cited by 484
Traffic Simulation with SUMO – Simulation of Urban Mobility
Krajzewicz, D. (2010) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6142-6_7 · Cited by 367
Effects of Individual Differences on Driving Behavior and Traffic Flow Characteristics
Rong, J., Mao, K., & Ma, J. (2011) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2248-01 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Brockfeld, E., & Wagner, P.
- Venue
- Traffic and Granular Flow ’03
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2007-08-14
- Pages
- 67-72
- OpenAlex
- W2108386124
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-28091-x_6
- The paper
- Brockfeld, E., & Wagner, P. (2007). Calibration and Validation of Microscopic Traffic Flow Models. Traffic and Granular Flow ’03. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28091-x_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
