The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of socially interactive robots
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x · Cited by 3,162
Self-citationHuman–Robot Interaction: A Survey
Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000005 · Cited by 1,541
Social Robots for Long-Term Interaction: A Survey
Leite, I., Martinho, C., & Paiva, A. (2013) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y · Cited by 871
Human – robot interaction review and challenges on task planning and programming
Tsarouchi, P., Makris, S., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016) · International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1080/0951192x.2015.1130251 · Cited by 376
Collaboration in Human-Robot Teams
Hoffman, G., & Breazeal, C. (2004) · AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference · doi:10.2514/6.2004-6434 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, T., Thorpe, C., & Baur, C.
- Venue
- Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2007-08-11
- Pages
- 255-266
- OpenAlex
- W1539761902
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 71.94
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-36460-9_17
- The paper
- Fong, T., Thorpe, C., & Baur, C. (2007). Collaboration, Dialogue, Human-Robot Interaction. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36460-9_17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
