The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SODA: Societies and Infrastructures in the Analysis and Design of Agent-Based Systems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intelligent agents: theory and practice
Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888900008122 · Cited by 6,810
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/174666.174668 · Cited by 3,504
The Gaia Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design
Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., & Kinny, D. (2000) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1010071910869 · Cited by 1,928
Coordination Models and Languages
Papadopoulos, G. A., & Arbab, F. (1998) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60208-9 · Cited by 856
Agent-based software engineering
Wooldridge, M. (1997) · IEE Proceedings - Software Engineering · doi:10.1049/ip-sen:19971026 · Cited by 803
Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms
Wegner, P. (1997) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/253769.253801 · Cited by 723
On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design
Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00007-n · Cited by 463
Agent communication languages: rethinking the principles
Singh, M. P. (1998) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.735849 · Cited by 442
Representing Agent Interaction Protocols in UML
Odell, J., Parunak, H. V. D., & Bauer, B. (2001) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44564-1_8 · Cited by 430
Organisational Abstractions for the Analysis and Design of Multi-agent Systems
Zambonelli, F., Jennings, N. R., & Wooldridge, M. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44564-1_16 · Cited by 285
Cited by
Artifacts in the A&A meta-model for multi-agent systems
Omicini, A., Ricci, A., & Viroli, M. (2008) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-008-9053-x · Cited by 347
Self-citationChallenges and Research Directions in Agent-Oriented Software Engineering
Zambonelli, F., & Omicini, A. (2004) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1023/b:agnt.0000038028.66672.1e · Cited by 253
Self-citationLogic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
“As suggested by Omicini [273], we categorise the selected technologies on the three main abstractions in MAS—namely, agents, societies, and the environment—thus revealing an uneven distribution of logic-based technologies on MAS abstractions, and highlighting research opportunities on less popular abstractions—as the…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Omicini, A.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2177768973
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 13.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SODA: Societies and Infrastructures in the Analysis and Design of Agent-Based Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-44564-1_12
- The paper
- Omicini, A. (2001). SODA: Societies and Infrastructures in the Analysis and Design of Agent-Based Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44564-1_12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
