The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms
Open accessAbstract
The article goes into the reason behind interaction being more powerful than algorithms. Interaction is a more powerful paradigm than rule-based algorithms for computer problem-solving, overturning the prevailing view that all computing is expressible as algorithms. The paradigm shift from algorithms to interaction captures the technology shift from mainframes to workstations and networks, from number-crunching to embedded systems and graphical user interfaces, and from procedure-oriented to object-based and distributed programming. The radical notion that interactive systems are more powerful problem-solving engines than algorithms is the basis for a new paradigm for computing technology built around the unifying concept of interaction. Whereas interaction histories express the external unfolding of events in time, instruction-execution histories express an ordering of inner events of an algorithm without any relation to the actual passage of time. Algorithmic time is intentionally measured by number of instructions executed, rather than by the actual time taken by execution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics
Penrose, R., & Gardner, M. (1989) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001 · Cited by 2,007
Cited by
Rezwana, J., & Maher, M. L. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3519026 · Cited by 342
Bader, V., & Kaiser, S. (2019) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508419855714 · Cited by 232
Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Nilsson, A. (2008) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.49 · Cited by 161
Developing pervasive multi-agent systems with nature-inspired coordination
Zambonelli, F., Omicini, A., Anzengruber, B., Castelli, G., De Angelis, F. L., Serugendo, G. D. M., Dobson, S., Fernandez-Marquez, J. L., Ferscha, A., Mamei, M., et al. (2015) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2014.12.002 · Cited by 96
Rezwana, J., & Maher, M. L. (2022) · Creativity and Cognition · doi:10.1145/3527927.3532789 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Wegner, P.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 80-91
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2141955344
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 43.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/253769.253801
- The paper
- Wegner, P. (1997). Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/253769.253801
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.