The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Aggregation and Correlation of Intrusion-Detection Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Processing flows of information: From data stream to complex event processing
Cugola, G., & Margara, A. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2187671.2187677 · Cited by 833
Alert correlation in a cooperative intrusion detection framework
Cuppens, F., & Miege, A. (2005) · Proceedings 2002 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/secpri.2002.1004372 · Cited by 696
HOLMES: Real-Time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flows
Milajerdi, S. M., Gjomemo, R., Eshete, B., Sekar, R., & Venkatakrishnan, V. N. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2019.00026 · Cited by 573
Clustering intrusion detection alarms to support root cause analysis
Julisch, K. (2003) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/950191.950192 · Cited by 419
A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection
Zhou, C. V., Leckie, C., & Karunasekera, S. (2010) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.06.008 · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- Debar, H., & Wespi, A.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 85-103
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1495304983
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aggregation and Correlation of Intrusion-Detection Alerts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-45474-8_6
- The paper
- Debar, H., & Wespi, A. (2001). Aggregation and Correlation of Intrusion-Detection Alerts. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45474-8_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
