The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Space/time trade-offs in hash coding with allowable errors
Bloom, B. H. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362686.362692 · Cited by 7,492
A taxonomy of DDoS attack and DDoS defense mechanisms
Mirkovic, J., & Reiher, P. (2004) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/997150.997156 · Cited by 2,017
Mining anomalies using traffic feature distributions
Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., & Diot, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/1080091.1080118 · Cited by 1,054
Diagnosing network-wide traffic anomalies
Lakhina, A., Crovella, M., & Diot, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/1015467.1015492 · Cited by 1,039
A framework for constructing features and models for intrusion detection systems
Lee, W., & Stolfo, S. J. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/382912.382914 · Cited by 974
Moore, D., Paxson, V., Savage, S., Shannon, C., Staniford, S., & Weaver, N. (2003) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2003.1219056 · Cited by 973
Code-Red: a case study on the spread and victims of an internet worm
Moore, D., Shannon, C., & claffy, K. (2002) · Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet measurment - IMW '02 · doi:10.1145/637201.637244 · Cited by 787
Survey of network-based defense mechanisms countering the DoS and DDoS problems
Peng, T., Leckie, C., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2007) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1216370.1216373 · Cited by 759
Self-citationEMERALD: Event Monitoring Enabling Responses to Anomalous Live Disturbances
Porras, P. A., Neumann, P. G., & Avenue, R. (2002) · Cited by 699
Cited by
A Survey of Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks
Butun, I., Morgera, S. D., & Sankar, R. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00191 · Cited by 833
An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: A systematic review
Patel, A., Taghavi, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Celestino Júnior, J. (2013) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.08.007 · Cited by 425
Ghaffarian, S. M., & Shahriari, H. R. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3092566 · Cited by 353
Intrusion detection and Big Heterogeneous Data: a Survey
Zuech, R., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Wald, R. (2015) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0013-4 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, C. V., Leckie, C., & Karunasekera, S.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 124-140
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013627100
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 29.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2009.06.008
- The paper
- Zhou, C. V., Leckie, C., & Karunasekera, S. (2010). A survey of coordinated attacks and collaborative intrusion detection. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2009.06.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
