The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines of Business Process Modeling
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
Chen, P. P.-S. (1976) · ACM Transactions on Database Systems · doi:10.1145/320434.320440 · Cited by 4,708
Cited by
Moody, D. L. (2005) · Data & Knowledge Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.datak.2004.12.005 · Cited by 469
Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study
Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., & Rosemann, M. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000546 · Cited by 276
Self-citationTen principles of good business process management
vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., & Viaene, S. (2014) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-06-2013-0074 · Cited by 272
Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application
Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/bf02683509 · Cited by 269
Al-Sabri, H. M., Al-Mashari, M., & Chikh, A. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-07-2016-0139 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2000
- Pages
- 30-49
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2116530587
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/3-540-45594-9_3
- The paper
- Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C. (2000). Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45594-9_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
