The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study
Open accessAbstract
Business process modelling has gained widespread acceptance as a valuable design and management technique for a variety of purposes. While there has been much research on process modelling techniques and corresponding tools, there has been little empirical research into the success factors of effective process modelling, and the post hoc evaluation of process modelling success. This paper reports on the first attempt to identify process modelling success factors and measures, as empirically evidenced in case studies of nine process modelling projects in three leading Australian organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248684 · Cited by 4,716
Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4486 · Cited by 4,378
Toffler, A. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,352
Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods
Dijkstra, L. (1985) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(85)90239-5 · Cited by 2,880
Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction
Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530 · Cited by 2,542
A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success
Seddon, P. B. (1997) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.240 · Cited by 2,437
Gillham, B. (2000) · Cited by 2,100
Cited by
The critical success factors of business process management
Trkman, P. (2010) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003 · Cited by 1,016
Ten principles of good business process management
vom Brocke, J., Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Trkman, P., Mertens, W., & Viaene, S. (2014) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-06-2013-0074 · Cited by 272
Enhancing Declarative Business Process Management Availability through Generative AI
Santos, W. D. S., Coutinho, J. R., Baião, F., Miranda Spyrides, G., & Vieira Lopes, H. C. (2025) · Process Science · doi:10.1007/s44311-025-00029-1 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., & Rosemann, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 347-360
- ISSN
- 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
- 1476-9344
- OpenAlex
- W1973134064
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 14.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000546
- The paper
- Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., & Rosemann, M. (2005). Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study. European Journal of Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000546
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
