Cited by 471Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms

Foundations of Inductive Logic Programming

Nienhuys-Cheng, Shan-Hwei, Wolf, Roland·1997·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-62927-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ILP approaches use a language bias to restrict the hypothesis space.

    “ILP approaches use a language bias (Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997) to restrict the hypothesis space.”

    From Learning programs by learning from failures (2021) · cites this paper as Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997

  • If a clause C1 subsumes a clause C2, then C1 entails C2.

    “If a clause C 1 subsumes a clause C 2 then C 1 entails C 2 (Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997).”

    From Learning programs by learning from failures (2021) · cites this paper as Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997

  • Refinement operators for clauses and theories have been studied in detail in ILP.

    “By contrast, refinement operators for clauses (Shapiro 1983; De Raedt and Bruynooghe 1993; Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997) and theories (Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997; Midelfart 1999; Badea 2001) have been studied in detail in ILP.”

    From Learning programs by learning from failures (2021) · cites this paper as Nienhuys-Cheng and de Wolf 1997

  • Reasoning about full clausal logic is computationally expensive.

    “However, reasoning about full clausal logic is computationally expensive (Nienhuys-Cheng & Wolf, 1997).”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Nienhuys-Cheng & Wolf, 1997

  • In general, deciding subsumption is a NP-complete problem.

    “in general, deciding subsumption is a NP-complete problem (Nienhuys-Cheng & Wolf, 1997).”

    From Inductive Logic Programming At 30: A New Introduction (2022) · cites this paper as Nienhuys-Cheng & Wolf, 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nienhuys-Cheng, S.-H., & Wolf, R.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
1997
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2169042011
Cited by
471
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Keywords
inductive logic programming, logic programming, machine learning, inductive reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review