Cited by 12Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningData Mining Algorithms and Applications

A Bounded Search Space of Clausal Theories

Midelfart, Herman·1999·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/3-540-48751-4_20

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Midelfart (1999) extends subsumption to clausal theories.

    “Midelfart (1999) extends subsumption to clausal theories:”

    From Learning programs by learning from failures (2021) · cites this paper as Midelfart (1999)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Midelfart, H.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Midelfart, Herman
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
1999
Pages
210-221
ISSN
0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1491793019
Cited by
12
References
9
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
inductive logic programming, search space, refinement operators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review