The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generalised Linear Models
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pendlebury, S. T., & Rothwell, P. M. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70236-4 · Cited by 1,853
Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 2. A quantitative analysis
Laslett, G. M., Green, P. F., Duddy, I. R., & Gleadow, A. J. W. (1987) · Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section · doi:10.1016/0168-9622(87)90057-1 · Cited by 836
Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Giles, M. F., & Rothwell, P. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70274-0 · Cited by 676
A preliminary trial of high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid in primary sclerosing cholangitis
Mitchell, S. A., Bansi, D. S., Hunt, N., Bergmann, K. V., Fleming, K. A., & Chapman, R. W. (2001) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2001.27965 · Cited by 351
How to make biological surveys go further with generalised linear models
Nicholls, A. O. (1989) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(89)90005-0 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Venue
- Springer Texts in Statistics
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 301-333
- ISSN
- 1431-875X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2478890193
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.90
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalised Linear Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-0-387-73251-0_10
- The paper
- Generalised Linear Models. (2008). Springer Texts in Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73251-0_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
