Cited by 290Education and Technology IntegrationEducation and Digital TechnologiesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Factors Affecting Teachers’ Pedagogical Adoption of ICT

Somekh, Bridget·2008·International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_27

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Somekh, B.
Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Somekh, Bridget
Venue
International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2008-08-25
Pages
449-460
OpenAlex
W1101424810
Cited by
290
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
30.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education and Digital Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
sociocultural theory, resistance to change, transformative pedagogy, educational technology, national education policy, curriculum and assessment, organizational structure, social practices, affordances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review