Cited by 62Smart Grid Security and ResilienceNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionIndustrial Automation and Control Systems

Intrusion Detection and Event Monitoring in SCADA Networks

Open access
Oman, Paul, Phillips, Matthew·2007·IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-0-387-75462-8_12

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presented algorithm approaches an average precision of 98% in recognizing the critical states.

    “The presented algorithm approaches an average precision of 98% in recognizing the critical states.”

    From Architecture and security of SCADA systems: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [88]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. P. Oman, E. Schweitzer and J. Roberts, Protecting the grid from cyber attack -Part 1: Recognizing our vulnerabilities, Utility Automation & Enginering T&D, vol. 6(7), pp. 16-22, 2001.
  2. P. Oman, E. Schweitzer and J. Roberts, Protecting the grid from cyber attack -Part 2: Safeguarding IEDs, substations and SCADA systems, Utility Automation & Enginering T&D, vol. 7(1), pp. 25-32, 2002.
  3. M. Phillips, Event Monitoring and Intrusion Detection in SCADA Sys- tems, M.S. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 2005.
  4. J. Waite, A Testbed for SCADA Security and Survivability Research and Instruction, M.S. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 2004.
  5. J. Waite, J. Oman, M. Phillips, S. Melton and V. Nair, A SCADA testbed for teaching and learning, Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual North American Power Symposium, pp. 447-451, 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oman, P., & Phillips, M.
Affiliations
University of Idaho (US)
Venue
IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2007-11-06
Pages
161-173
OpenAlex
W1481879093
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0416757, 0114016)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
Keywords
intrusion detection, event monitoring, SCADA networks, industrial cybersecurity, unauthorized access detection, security audit, real-time monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review