CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41Eastern European Communism and ReformsWar, Law, and JusticePolitical Philosophy and Ethics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dilemmas of Justice in Eastern Europe’s Democratic Transitions

Calhoun, Noel·2004·Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-07453-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Calhoun innovatively examines how the ideology of liberal democracy influences one of the most contentious and potentially traumatic and divisive issues facing countries transitioning from authoritari

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-137-07453-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Calhoun, N.
Corresponding author
Calhoun, Noel
Venue
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan US
Published
2004
DOI
10.1007/978-1-137-07453-9
OpenAlex
W2073928525
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
justice, democratic transition, liberal democracy, post-communist transition, Eastern Europe, transitional justice, ideology, democratization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review