Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 518

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension?

Laufer, Batia·1992·Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics
DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem ? Alderson (1984) ascribes poor reading in L2 to four possible causes: (a) poor reading ability in the first language; (b) inadequate knowledge of the foreign language; (c) incorrect strategies for reading in the foreign language; (d) reading strategies in the first language not being employed in the foreign language, due to inadequate knowledge of the foreign language. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Alderson, J.C. (1984). ‘Reading in a foreign language: a reading problem or a language problem?’, in Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H. (eds), Reading in a Foreign Language. London: Longman, pp. 1–27.
  2. Cohen, A.D., Glasman, B., Rosenbaum-Cohen, P.R., Ferrara, J. and Fine, J. (1979). ‘Reading English for specialized purposes: discourse analysis and the use of student informants’, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 13, PP. 551–64. · doi:10.2307/3586449
  3. Davis, F.B. (1968). ‘Research in comprehension in reading’, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 4, pp. 499–545 (quoted in Nation and Coady, 1987). · DOI
  4. Davis, F.B. (1972). ‘Psychometric research on comprehension in reading’, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 7, pp. 628–78 (quoted in Nation and Coady, 1987). · DOI
  5. Deville, G. (1985). Measuring a FL learner’s lexical needs. Paper presented at the 5th LSP Symposium, Leuven, Belgium.
  6. Laufer, B. (1989). ‘What percentage of lexis is essential for comprehension’, in Lauren, C. and Nordman, M. (eds), From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 316–23.
  7. Laufer, B. and Sim, D.D. (1985a). ‘Taking the easy way out: non-use and misuse of contextual clues in EFL reading comprehension’, English Teaching Forum, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 7–10.
  8. Laufer, B. and Sim, D.D. (1985b). ‘Measuring and explaining the threshold needed for English for Academic Purposes texts’, Foreign Language Annals, Vol. 18, pp. 405–13. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Meara, P. and Buxton, B. (1987). ‘An alternative to multiple choice vocabulary tests’, Language Testing, Vol. 4, pp. 142–54. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Meara, P. and Jones, G. (1989). Eurocentres Vocabulary Test 10 KA. Zurich: Eurocentres.
  11. Nation, P. (1983a). ‘Testing and teaching vocabulary’, Guidelines 5 (RELC supplement), pp. 12–24.
  12. Nation, P. (1983b). Learning and Teaching Vocabulary. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University.
  13. Nation, P. and Coady, J. (1987). ‘Vocabulary and reading’, in Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (eds), Vocabulary and Language Teaching. London: Longman, pp. 97–110.
  14. Ostyn, P. and Godin, P. (1985). ‘RALEX: an alternative approach to language teaching’, Modern Language Journal, Vol. 69, pp. 346–53. · DOI
  15. Ostyn, P., Vandecasteele, M., Deville, G. and Kelly, P. (1985). ‘Towards an optimal programme of FL vocabulary acquisition’, in Cornu, A.M., Vanparijs, J., Delaheye, M. and Baten, L. (eds), Beads or Bracelet? How do we approach LSP? Oxford University Press, pp. 292–305.
  16. Spearritt, D. (1972). ‘Identification of subskills of reading comprehension by maximum likelihood factor analysis’, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 8, PP 92–11 (quoted in Nation and Coady, 1987). · DOI
  17. Thorndike, E.L. (1973). ‘Reading as reasoning’, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 9, pp. 135–47 (quoted in Nation and Coady, 1987). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ulijn, J.M. (1984). ‘Reading for professional purposes: psycholinguistic evidence in a cross-linguistic perspective’, in Pugh, A.K. and Ulijn, J.M. (eds), Reading for Professional Purposes. London: Heinemann, pp. 66–81.
  19. West, M.P. (1941). Learning to Read in a Foreign Language. London: Longman (quoted in Nation and Coady, 1987).

Cited by

See all 518

Metadata

Authors
Laufer, B.
Venue
Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
1992
Pages
126-132
DOI
10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
OpenAlex
W20138697
Cited by
518
References
0
FWCI
0.83
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
The paper
Laufer, B. (1992). How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension? Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.