The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It?
Abstract
The paper examines the relationship between memorization of new words (short-term and long-term) and teaching techniques involving different modes of vocabulary presentation and different language of vocabulary glossing. The four modes were: 1- words presented in isolation, 2 - in 'minimal context', i.e., in one meaningful sentence, 3 - in text-context, 4 - in 'elaborated' text context, i.e., in the original text supplemented by clarifying phrases and sentences. In each mode of presentation, half (ten) of the words were translated into learners' L 1 and half were explained in English. An additional group of learners served as a control. They were asked to learn the words for a quiz by themselves. All subjects were tested on the short-term and long-term retention of the target words. Retention scores were compared by mode of presentation, language of glossing and the interaction between the two. Words glossed in L 1 were always better retained than those glossed in L2. As for context effect, words presented in lists and in sentences were remembered better than words presented in text and elaborated text. The control group received the lowest scores. The results underscore the importance of attending to newly learnt vocabulary and relating it to the first language. It is suggested that mental elaboration which is claimed to affect retention may not necessarily take place when words are encountered in texts. On the other hand, bilingual lists may be conducive to such elaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435
Teaching and learning vocabulary
Nation, P. (1994) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(94)90065-5 · Cited by 1,733
Awareness and Second Language Acquisition
Schmidt, R. (1992) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190500002476 · Cited by 825
(1991) · Alphabetischer Katalog. Med – Schr · doi:10.1515/9783110977479-006 · Cited by 777
Doughty, C. (1991) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010287 · Cited by 619
How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension?
Laufer, B. (1992) · Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12 · Cited by 518
Self-citationDuncan, M. H. (1961) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1961.tb04136.x · Cited by 489
Mnemotechnics in second-language learning.
Atkinson, R. C. (1975) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0077029 · Cited by 447
Vocabulary learning and reading
Saragi, T., Nation, I. S. P., & Meister, G. F. (1978) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(78)90027-1 · Cited by 347
The Effects of Simplified and Elaborated Texts on Foreign Language Reading Comprehension
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x · Cited by 279
Cited by
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
(2007) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 951
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.011 · Cited by 769
RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge
Webb, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050023 · Cited by 527
Elgort, I., & Warren, P. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12052 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K.
- Venue
- RELC Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-108
- ISSN
- 0033-6882 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-526X
- OpenAlex
- W2151123833
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003368829702800106
- The paper
- Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing New Words: Does Teaching Have Anything To Do With It? RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829702800106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.