CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 350Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Feminist Politics: What’s Home Got to Do with It?

Martin, Biddy, Mohanty, Chandra Talpade·1986·Feminist Studies/Critical Studies
DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7_12
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We began working on this project after visiting our respective “homes” in Lynchburg, Virginia and Bombay, India in the fall of 1984—visits fraught with conflict, loss, memories, and desires we both considered to be of central importance in thinking about our relationship to feminist politics. In spite of significant differences in our personal histories and academic backgrounds, and the displacements we both experience, the political and intellectual positions we share made it possible for us to work on, indeed to write, this essay together. Our separate readings of Minnie Bruce Pratt’s autobiographical narrative entitled “Identity: Skin Blood Heart” became the occasion for thinking through and developing more precisely some of the ideas about feminist theory and politics that have occupied us. We are interested in the configuration of home, identity, and community; more specifically, in the power and appeal of “home” as a concept and a desire, its occurrence as metaphor in feminist writings, and its challenging presence in the rhetoric of the New Right. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7_12

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Zillah Eisenstein, Feminism and Sexual Equality ( New York: Monthly Review, 1984 ).
  2. Cherrie Moraga, Loving in the War Years ( Boston: South End Press, 1984 ).
  3. Susan Griffin, Pornography and Silence ( New York: Harper and Row, 1981 ).
  4. See critiques of Brownmiller (1975) by Angela Davis (Women, Race, and Class [Boston: Doubleday, 1983])
  5. Bell Hooks (Ain’t l a Woman: Black Women and Feminism [Boston; South End Press, 1981])
  6. Jacqueline Dowd Hall (“The Mind That Burns in Each Body: Women, Rape, and Racial Violence,” in Powers of Desire, ed. Ann Snitow, Christine Stansell, and Sharon Thompson [New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983], pp. 328–49).
  7. Edward Said, Orientalism ( New York: Vintage, 1979 );

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 350

Related

Metadata

Authors
Martin, B., & Mohanty, C. T.
Venue
Feminist Studies/Critical Studies
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Published
1986
Pages
191-212
DOI
10.1007/978-1-349-18997-7_12
OpenAlex
W2490066011
Cited by
350
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
20.29
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
feminist politics, home, identity, community, displacement, New Right, feminist theory, metaphor, Lynchburg, Virginia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review