Cited by 4,855Feminist Theory and Gender StudiesDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses

Mohanty, Chandra·1988·Feminist Review

Abstract

knowledge' about women in the third world by particular analytic categories employed in writings on the subject which take as their primary point of reference feminist interests as they have been articulated in the US and western Europe.My concern about such writings derives from my own implication and investment in contemporary debates in feminist theory, and the urgent political necessity of forming strategic coalitions across class, race and national boundaries.Clearly, western feminist discourse and

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/fr.1988.42

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analyses of 'male violence' must be theorised and interpreted within specific societies in order to better understand it and effectively organise to challenge it.

    “As Mohanty (1988) and others argue, analyses of 'male violence' must be theorised and interpreted within specific societies in order to better understand it and effectively organise to challenge it.”
  • Rights-based interventions on FGM/C and other harmful cultural practices affecting women in the Majority world are in danger of being based on neocolonial attitudes that lack understanding for 'non-Western' cultures unless they are led by women and men (and girls and boys) from communities where these customs are practised, and are connected to broader structural issues of education, health, and贫困

    “unless rights-based interventions on FGM/C and other harmful cultural practices affecting women in the Majority world are led by women and men (and I would add girls and boys) from communities where these customs are practised, and are connected to broader structural issues of education, health, and poverty reduction programmes, such interventions are in danger of being based on neocolonial attit”
  • FGM/C rights-based interventions may also be criticised as being driven by 'Western' donor concerns that 'lack respect' for particular cultures and perpetuate colonial and modernist discourses that construct culture and tradition as 'backward'.

    “FGM/C rights-based interventions may also be criticised as being driven by 'Western' donor concerns that 'lack respect' for particular cultures and perpetuate colonial and modernist discourses that construct culture and tradition as 'backward' (Mohanty, 1988; see also Potter et al, 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohanty, C.
Corresponding author
Mohanty, Chandra
Venue
Feminist Review
Published
1988-11
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
61-88
ISSN
  • 0141-7789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4380
OpenAlex
W1987351853
Cited by
4,855
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 156 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 190 · 2022: 248 · 2021: 260 · 2020: 282 · 2019: 314 · 2018: 213 · 2017: 173 · 2016: 198 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 227 · 2013: 206 · 2012: 241
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Feminist Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
feminist scholarship, colonial discourse, women in the Global South, Western feminism, feminist theory, knowledge production, race and class, decolonization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review