The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Conflict in the Labour Process: The Logic and Autonomy of Struggle
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, it is rare to find differentiation between levels of control, as in Edwards's (1990) distinction between 'detailed control' of the labour process and 'general control' of the overall productive system.”
From New social relations of digital technology and the future of work: Beyond technological determinism (2023) · cites this paper as Edwards, 1990
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017019836911 · Cited by 657
New social relations of digital technology and the future of work: Beyond technological determinism
Joyce, S., Umney, C., Whittaker, X., & Stuart, M. (2023) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12276 · Cited by 97
Brook, P. (2013) · Culture and Organization · doi:10.1080/14759551.2013.827423 · Cited by 30
“This is precisely why LPA recognises that the experience of employment produces a rich mix of dynamic responses amongst individual workers, ranging from consent to resistance (Edwards 1990; Thompson 1983/1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialLabor, Capital, and Machine: Toward a Labor Process Theory for HCI
Qin, Y., & Cheon, E. (2026) · Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791147 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Edwards, P. K.
- Venue
- Labour Process Theory
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1990
- Pages
- 125-152
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Conflict in the Labour Process: The Logic and Autonomy of Struggle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-20466-3_4
- The paper
- Edwards, P. K. (1990). Understanding Conflict in the Labour Process: The Logic and Autonomy of Struggle. Labour Process Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20466-3_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
