The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science as a Vocation
Abstract
… Scientific work is chained to the course of progress; whereas in the realm of art there is no progress in the same sense. It is not true that the work of art of a period that has worked out new technical means, or, for instance, the laws of perspective, stands therefore artistically higher than a work of art devoid of all knowledge of those means and laws — if its form does justice to the material, that is, if its object has been chosen and formed so that it could be artistically mastered without applying those conditions and means. A work of art which is genuine “fulfilment” is never surpassed; it will never be antiquated. Individuals may differ in appreciating the personal significance of works of art, but no one will ever be able to say of such a work that it is ‘outstripped’ by another work which is also “fulfilment.” These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The sovereign monopoly over the legitimate use of force is defined by its right to kill (Weber 1946), while the necropolitical ability to designate certain populations as not worthy of life is central to the its modern biopolitical management (Mbembe 2003).”
From Exhuming Dead Persons: Forensic Science and the Making of Post-fascist Publics in Spain (2020) · cites this paper as Weber 1946
Citations
Cited by
International Norm Dynamics and Political Change
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081898550789 · Cited by 8,292
Music as a technology of the self
DeNora, T. (1999) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/s0304-422x(99)00017-0 · Cited by 495
Belief, knowledge and expertise: the emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology
Prior, L. (2003) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00339 · Cited by 478
Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2016) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mww033 · Cited by 474
Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty
Zinn, J. O. (2008) · Health, Risk & Society · doi:10.1080/13698570802380891 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, M.
- Venue
- Science and the Quest for Reality
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- Published
- 1946
- Pages
- 382-394
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Science as a Vocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_17
- The paper
- Weber, M. (1946). Science as a Vocation. Science and the Quest for Reality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25249-7_17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.