The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Social Work with Disabled People
Abstract
This book has been substantially revised to take into account the legislative changes since 1983 and the theoretical developments in the field of disability. Whilst continuing to highlight the negativ
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The social model of disability: thirty years on
Oliver, M. (2013) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773 · Cited by 1,648
Self-citationChanging the Social Relations of Research Production?
Oliver, M. (1992) · Disability, Handicap & Society · doi:10.1080/02674649266780141 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationThe biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come
Wade, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2017) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215517709890 · Cited by 787
Scambler, G. (2009) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01161.x · Cited by 658
Disability, work, and welfare: challenging the social exclusion of disabled people
Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017005055669 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, M.
- Publisher
- Macmillan Education UK
- Published
- 1983
- OpenAlex
- W4299557921
- Cited by
- 813
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.31
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Work with Disabled People. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-349-86058-6
- The paper
- Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-86058-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
