The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?
Abstract
This paper will argue that research on disability has had little influence on policy and made no contribution to improving the lives of disabled people. In fact, up to now the process of research production has been alienating both for disabled people and for researchers themselves. Neither positivist nor interpretive paradigms are immune from the characterisation of research as alienation, and hence it is suggested that the only way to produce unalienated research is to change the social relations of research production. This change will require the development of an emancipatory research paradigm and both the development of and agenda for such a paradigm are briefly considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S. (1964) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217783 · Cited by 9,130
Oliver, M. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · Cited by 4,227
Self-citationBecoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research
Newsome, G. L., Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation · doi:10.2307/1495177 · Cited by 3,449
(2020) · Radical Treatment · doi:10.2307/j.ctvw1d7dg.9 · Cited by 3,373
Rural development : putting the last first
Chambers, R. (1983) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 2,895
New rules of sociological method
Giddens, A. (1976) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 2,673
Lather, P. (1986) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482 · Cited by 1,288
International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps
Ford, B. (1984) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb103888.x · Cited by 1,284
Zimmerman, M. K., & Roberts, H. (1982) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2068581 · Cited by 1,255
Cited by
Dilemmas in qualitative health research
Yardley, L. (2000) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440008400302 · Cited by 2,310
What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research
BARNES, C. (2003) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/713662197 · Cited by 406
From Cure to Community: Transforming Notions of Autism
Bagatell, N. (2010) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01080.x · Cited by 327
User Involvement in Research and Evaluation: Liberation or Regulation?
Beresford, P. (2002) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746402000222 · Cited by 304
Corporate culture and the employment of persons with disabilities
Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blanck, P. (2005) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.624 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, M.
- Venue
- Disability, Handicap & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-114
- ISSN
- 0267-4645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052592348
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 40.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing the Social Relations of Research Production? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02674649266780141
- The paper
- Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the Social Relations of Research Production? Disability, Handicap & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.