Cited by 17Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchPolitical Science Research and EducationEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Boolean Analysis, Mechanisms, and the Study of Regime Effectiveness

Stokke, Olav Schram·2004·Regime Consequences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-2208-1_5

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many authors consider the extension of QCA logic to fuzzy sets as a response to critiques, since fuzzy sets seem to allow for measurement error.

    “Many authors consider the extension of the QCA logic to fuzzy sets (Ragin 2000) as a response to such critiques, since fuzzy sets seem to allow for measurement error (e.g., Stokke 2004; Ebbinghaus 2005).”
  • Stokke (2004) discusses vulnerability to miscodings and suggests that Boolean QCA makes strong assumptions on the accuracy of the data.

    “Stokke (2004, 108), on the other hand, in his study on regime effectiveness in international relations, discusses the issue of '[v]ulnerability to [m]iscodings' and suggests that ' . . . the Boolean version of QCA . . . makes strong assumptions on the accuracy of the data.'”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stokke, O. S.
Affiliations
Fridtjof Nansen Institute (NO)
Corresponding author
Stokke, Olav Schram
Venue
Regime Consequences
Published
2004
Pages
87-119
OpenAlex
W188807677
Cited by
17
References
54
Citations by year
2023: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
regime effectiveness, causal mechanisms, Boolean analysis, fuzzy-set QCA, qualitative comparative analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review