Cited by 340Mathematical functions and polynomialsAdvanced Mathematical IdentitiesMathematical and Computational Methods

Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special Functions

Annie A. M. Cuyt, Haakon Waadeland, Brigitte M. Verdonk, Vigdis Brevik Petersen, William B. Jones·2008·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4020-6949-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuyt, A. A. M., Waadeland, H., Verdonk, B. M., Petersen, V. B., & Jones, W. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag (NO)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W351274383
Cited by
340
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.64
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical functions and polynomials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Algebra and Number Theory › Advanced Mathematical Identities
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical and Computational Methods
Keywords
continued fractions, special functions, continued fraction expansion, hypergeometric functions, orthogonal polynomials, numerical evaluation of special functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review