The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Can Practice Reshape Assessment?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This approach takes a practice view that sees assessment as a key element of the process of developing and informing the learner's judgements for learning beyond the immediate task (Boud 2009).”
From Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design (2013) · cites this paper as Boud 2009
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152 · cited 1×
“The classroom assessment tradition has been reinvigorated in recent times through a renewed emphasis on research on formative assessment in education generally ( Black & Wiliam, 1998 ), on self assessment in higher education (Boud, 1995) and on how assessment frames learning (Gibbs, 2006).”
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term
(2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203964309 · Cited by 1,049
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self assessment. London: Kogan Page.
- Boud, D. (2006, July). Relocating reflection in the context of practice: Rehabilitation or rejection? Keynote address presented at Professional Lifelong Learning: Beyond Reflective Practice, a conference held at Trinity and All Saints College. Leeds: Institute for Lifelong Learning, University of Leeds. Retrieved 20 October, 2007, from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/155666.pdf
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. · DOI
- Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Developing assessment for informing judgement. In Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (Eds) Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term (pp. 181–197). London: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
- Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In K. Clegg & C. Bryan (Eds.), Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
- Hager, P., & Butler, J. (1996). Two models of educational assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(4), 367–378. · DOI
- Knight, P. (2007). Grading, classifying and future learning. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking Assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 72–86) London: Routledge.
- Kvale, S. (2008). A workplace perspective on school assessment, In A. Havnes & L. McDowell (Eds.), Balancing dilemmas in assessment and learning in contemporary education (pp. 197–208) New York: Routledge.
- Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77–84. · DOI · Paper page
- Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
- Schwandt, T. (2005). On modelling our understanding of the practice fields. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 13(3), 313–332. · DOI
- Tanggaard, L., & Elmholdt, C. (2008). Assessment in practice: An inspiration from apprenticeship. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(1), 97–116. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636
Self-citationSustainable assessment revisited
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133 · Cited by 576
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Boud, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Boud, David
- ORCID
- Boud, David
- Venue
- Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2008-11-13
- Pages
- 1-15
- OpenAlex
- W2013342484
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- practice-based assessment, assessment design, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
