Cited by 30Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Training Issues Unique to Autism Spectrum Disorders

LeBlanc, Linda A., Gravina, Nicole, Carr, James E.·2009·Applied Behavior Analysis for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-0088-3_13

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
LeBlanc, L. A., Gravina, N., & Carr, J. E.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
LeBlanc, Linda A.
Venue
Applied Behavior Analysis for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published
2009
Pages
225-235
OpenAlex
W67382405
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.27
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, applied behavior analysis, early intervention, discrete trial training, transition, tactile defensiveness, training problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review