Training individuals to implement discrete‐trial teaching procedures using behavioral skills training: A scoping review with implications for practice and research
Open accessAbstract
Behavioral skills training (BST) is an evidence-based approach for training individuals to implement discrete-trial teaching procedures. Despite the effectiveness of this approach, implementing BST can be time and resource intensive, which may interfere with a clinical organization's adoption of this training format. We conducted a scoping review of studies using BST components for training discrete-trial teaching procedures in peer-reviewed articles between 1977 and 2021. We identified 51 studies in 46 publications involving 354 participants. We coded descriptive data on (a) participant characteristics, (b) study characteristics, (c) training conditions (including instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback), and (d) training outcomes. The results indicated that studies have primarily attempted to improve the efficacy and efficiency of BST by modifying or omitting common training components. We provide best-practice considerations for using BST to teach discrete-trial teaching procedures and offer a research agenda to guide future investigation in this area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
9 of 86 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A survey on staff training and performance management practices indicated that evidence-based training approaches were used in practice about half of the time.
“Despite research suggesting that BST is an effective method for training individuals to implement DTT (Fingerhut & Moeyaert, 2022;Parsons et al., 2012), results from a survey on staff training and performance management practices indicated that evidence-based training approaches were used in practice about half of the time (DiGennaro Reed & Henley, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites DiGennaro Reed & Henley, 2015 source
The Initial or Pre-Service Training section reports that 46.89% of respondents who received initial training got performance feedback, and the Discussion says roughly 60% reported modeling. These are components of evidence-based training, but the Discussion also says a large majority did not receive the full training package. The paper does not establish that evidence-based approaches as a whole were used about half the time. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
BST is an evidence-based approach for training individuals to implement DTT procedures.
“Behavioral skills training (BST) is an evidence-based approach for training individuals to implement discrete-trial teaching procedures.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“Despite research suggesting that BST is an effective method for training individuals to implement DTT (Fingerhut & Moeyaert, 2022;Parsons et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
- Interpretationcitation
The instruction component may be insufficient because acquiring knowledge about a complex repertoire does not directly affect one's performance of that skill.
“The instruction component may be insufficient because acquiring knowledge about a complex repertoire does not directly affect one's performance of that skill (Parsons et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Parsons et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation
RCTs are the gold standard for effectiveness research.
“Given the number of studies demonstrating the efficacy of BST for teaching DTT procedures, it is somewhat surprising that more have not conducted RCTs, as this is the gold standard for effectiveness research (Hariton & Locascio, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hariton & Locascio, 2018 source
- Findingown data
The scoping review identified 51 studies within 46 publications involving 354 participants.
“We identified 51 studies in 46 publications involving 354 participants.”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“Across the three databases, we identified 51 studies within 46 articles published across 16 peer-reviewed journals from 1977 to 2021 for inclusion in this review”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data
Studies have primarily attempted to improve the efficacy and efficiency of BST by modifying or omitting common training components.
“The results indicated that studies have primarily attempted to improve the efficacy and efficiency of BST by modifying or omitting common training components.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Detailed demographic profiles were lacking in the reviewed studies.
“Overall, detailed demographic profiles were lacking, consistent with recently reported trends in the applied behavior-analytic literature (Jones et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data
Only Subramaniam et al. (2017) evaluated whether scores in a knowledge-based quiz were indicative of subsequent performance.
“Although many studies incorporated embedded quizzes or tests for mastery of knowledge-based content following experience with instructions, only Subramaniam et al. (2017) evaluated whether scores in a knowledge-based quiz were indicative of subsequent performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Subramaniam et al. (2017) source
- Findingown data
A modeling component was used in 43 of the 51 (84%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.
“A modeling component was used in 43 of the 51 (84%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Of the studies using a between-groups design, two conducted a randomized clinical trial (RCT) involving technicians or parents who were paired based on performance in a pretest and then randomly assigned to either a treatment or waitlist control group.
“Of the studies using a between-groups design, two conducted a randomized clinical trial (RCT) involving technicians or parents who were paired based on performance in a pretest and then randomly assigned to either a treatment or waitlist control group (Fisher et al., 2014(Fisher et al., , 2020)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Across the 51 studies, there were a total of 354 participants trained to implement DTT using BST components.
“Across the 51 studies, there were a total of 354 participants trained to implement DTT using BST components.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 51 studies reviewed, 24 (47%) reported a measure of procedural fidelity.
“Of the 51 studies reviewed, 24 (47%) reported a measure of procedural fidelity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the five studies that isolated the effects of instructions, all did so in the context of evaluating the effects of a self-instruction manual on DTT performance.
“However, of the five studies that isolated the effects of instructions (i.e., Al-Nasser et al., 2019; Study 1 of Arnal et al., 2007;Fazzio et al., 2009;Severtson & Carr, 2012;Thomson et al., 2012) all did so in the context of evaluating the effects of a self-instruction manual on DTT performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Researchers programmed an instructional component during BST to teach DTT procedures in all 51 (100%) studies.
“Researchers programmed an instructional component during BST to teach DTT procedures in all 51 (100%) studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most studies (46 out of 51; 90%) using an instruction component were combined with other training components during BST.
“Making meaningful conclusions regarding the isolated effects of instructions is difficult because most studies (46 out of 51; 90%) using an instruction component were combined with other training components during BST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Vocal feedback was the most common modality used across the studies reviewed.
“Interestingly, vocal feedback was the most common modality used across the studies reviewed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Details regarding the scripts that child confederates followed were rarely or inadequately described.
“In addition, details regarding the scripts that child confederates followed were rarely or inadequately described (see Gerencser et al., 2020, for a lengthier discussion of this finding).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A feedback component was used in 44 of the 51 (86%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.
“A feedback component was used in 44 of the 51 (86%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Four (9%) studies provided vocal feedback based on participants scoring a video demonstration of correct and incorrect DTT implementation.
“Twenty-four of the 44 (55%) studies reviewed provided vocal feedback only, 11 (25%) studies provided vocal plus visual feedback (e.g., including a written or graphical depiction of performance), and four (9%) studies provided vocal feedback based on participants scoring a video demonstration of correct and incorrect DTT implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over 80% of the studies that included a rehearsal component conducted this condition in combination with a feedback component.
“Unsurprisingly, over 80% of the studies that included a rehearsal component conducted this condition in combination with a feedback component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Across studies incorporating feedback, the content generally consisted of positive feedback for correct implementation and corrective feedback for incorrect implementation.
“Across studies incorporating feedback, the content generally consisted of positive feedback for correct implementation and corrective feedback for incorrect implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Twenty-four of the 44 (55%) studies reviewed provided vocal feedback only.
“Twenty-four of the 44 (55%) studies reviewed provided vocal feedback only, 11 (25%) studies provided vocal plus visual feedback (e.g., including a written or graphical depiction of performance), and four (9%) studies provided vocal feedback based on participants scoring a video demonstration of correct and incorrect DTT implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 48 studies reporting mastery criteria, 39 (81%) accepted less than 100% accuracy.
“Of the 48 studies reporting mastery criteria, 39 (81%) accepted less than 100% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A rehearsal component was used in 41 of the 51 (80%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.
“A rehearsal component was used in 41 of the 51 (80%) studies to teach participants DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Across the studies reviewed, feedback was typically delivered following the rehearsal trial or practice session.
“Across the studies reviewed, feedback was typically delivered following the rehearsal trial or practice session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Of the studies that isolated the effects of the rehearsal component, two studies only combined rehearsal with feedback on an as-needed basis.
“Of the studies that isolated the effects of the rehearsal component, two studies (Pollard et al., 2014; Study 1 of Higbee et al., 2016) only combined rehearsal with feedback on an as-needed basis (e.g., when a participant was consistently performing under the mastery criterion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
The studies using interactive media and audio components did not directly evaluate their utility compared with that of traditional training components.
“however, the studies using these interactive media and audio components did not directly evaluate their utility compared with that of traditional training components (e.g., in-person modeling, video modeling without added interactive features; cf.Geiger et al., 2018, which compared a computer-based training package to a standard BST package).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geiger et al., 2018 source
- Findingown data
Only three of the remaining 20 (15%) studies evaluated the effects of written feedback in isolation.
“Only three of the remaining 20 [15%] studies evaluated the effects of written feedback in isolation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The consecutive sessions required to demonstrate mastery ranged from one to four sessions.
“The consecutive sessions required to demonstrate this performance ranged from one (e.g., Subramaniam et al., 2017) to four (i.e., Crockett et al., 2007) sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mastery criterion percentage ranged from 80% to 100% accuracy across studies.
“The mastery criterion percentage ranged from 80% to 100% accuracy across studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 51 studies, 48 (94%) reported using a mastery criterion.
“Of the 51 studies, 48 (94%) reported using a mastery criterion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Eleven (25%) studies provided vocal plus visual feedback.
“Twenty-four of the 44 (55%) studies reviewed provided vocal feedback only, 11 (25%) studies provided vocal plus visual feedback (e.g., including a written or graphical depiction of performance), and four (9%) studies provided vocal feedback based on participants scoring a video demonstration of correct and incorrect DTT implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The remaining nine (19%) studies required 100% accuracy.
“The remaining nine (19%) studies required 100% accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Using feedback modalities that do not require the presence of a live trainer produces improvements in staff performance that are similar to the outcomes that are produced when BST is used with a traditional feedback component.
“The findings from these studies indicate that using feedback modalities that do not require the presence of a live trainer produces improvements in staff performance that are similar to the outcomes that are produced when BST is used with a traditional feedback component (i.e., the presence of a live trainer).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Data on the duration of time spent in the rehearsal component or the number of times staff were required to rehearse the target skill were rarely reported and could only sometimes be gleaned from the available data.
“Data on the duration of time spent in the rehearsal component or the number of times staff were required to rehearse the target skill were rarely reported and could only sometimes be gleaned from the available data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the studies that did not evaluate vocal feedback in isolation, 17 of the 20 (85%) remaining studies provided a combination of feedback modalities.
“Of the studies that did not evaluate vocal feedback in isolation, the remaining studies (17 of the 20 [85%] remaining studies) provided a combination of feedback modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The population from which social-validity data were obtained varied across studies, with some focusing on the trainers and others on the trainees.
“The population from which social-validity data were obtained varied across studies.Some focused on the trainers (e.g., Lerman et al., 2020), and others focused on the trainees (e.g., Leblanc et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately half of these studies (18 of the 34; 53%) assessed initial trainee performance at baseline for the conditions they would later probe for generality.
“Approximately half of these studies (18 of the 34; 53%) assessed initial trainee performance at baseline for the conditions they would later probe for generality (e.g., Romer et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Overall, studies primarily attempted to address common limitations associated with BST.
“Overall, studies primarily attempted to address common limitations associated with BST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thirty-two of the 51 (63%) studies assessed social validity.
“Thirty-two of the 51 (63%) studies assessed social validity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Based on these 41 studies, the time needed to complete all training components ranged from 4 to 4,200 min.
“Based on these 41 studies, the time needed to complete all training components ranged from 4 to 4,200 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There was a lack of reporting on the initial time and resource investment required to develop training protocols and materials.
“Unfortunately, there was also a lack of reporting on the initial time and resource investment required to develop training protocols and materials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Specific improvements to the standard BST approach demonstrated greater effects on DTT performance.
“We found evidence suggesting that specific improvements to the standard BST approach demonstrated greater effects on DTT performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
19 of the 34 (56%) studies described procedures explicitly programmed for generality during training for the type of generality being assessed.
“Further, we found that 19 of the 34 (56%) studies described procedures explicitly programmed for generality during training for the type of generality being assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 51 studies reviewed, 47 (92%) reported some information on the duration required to complete the training.
“Of the 51 studies reviewed, 47 (92%) reported some information on the duration required to complete the training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Studies attempting to improve the efficacy or efficiency of BST for training DTT procedures typically modified one or more training components and evaluated whether this resulted in improved performance in a timelier or resource-efficient manner.
“In general, studies attempting to improve the efficacy or efficiency of BST for training DTT procedures typically modified one or more training component(s) and evaluated whether this resulted in improved (or desirable levels of) performance in a timelier (or resource-efficient) manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only 41 of the 51 (80%) studies reported sufficient information to estimate the duration required to complete all training components.
“Only 41 of the 51 (80%) studies reported sufficient information to estimate the duration required to complete all training components (and total training time had to be calculated based on available information for 11 of these studies).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 21 of the 51 (41%) studies assessed performance maintenance after participants met the mastery criterion during training.
“Only 21 of the 51 (41%) studies assessed performance maintenance after participants met the mastery criterion during training (see Figure 2 for a summary of studies that assessed maintenance).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Few studies have attempted to determine whether all BST training components are necessary.
“Despite efficiency being a common goal of this research literature, few studies have attempted to determine whether all BST training components are necessary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Thirty-four out of 51 (67%) studies conducted generality probes following mastery of DTT procedures.
“Thirty-four out of 51 (67%) studies conducted generality probes following mastery of DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most maintenance checks occurred within the first 6 weeks postmastery (65% of studies reporting these data).
“Most maintenance checks occurred within the first 6 weeks postmastery (65% of studies reporting these data).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Feedback modalities that do not require the presence of a live trainer produce improvements in staff performance that are similar to the outcomes that are produced when in the presence of a live trainer.
“Further, findings indicated that feedback modalities that do not require the presence of a live trainer produce improvements in staff performance that are similar to the outcomes that are produced when in the presence of a live trainer (Nosik et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The remaining 15 studies did not assess maintenance beyond 12 weeks postmastery.
“The remaining 15 studies did not assess maintenance beyond 12 weeks postmastery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The major research trends observed in the literature were related to improving the efficacy and efficiency of BST for training individuals to implement DTT procedures.
“However, with the immense need for services and the limited number of qualified behavior analysts to provide training (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2023;Yingling et al., 2021;Yingling et al., 2022), it is no wonder that the major research trends we observed in the literature were related to improving the efficacy and efficiency of BST for training individuals to implement DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Individuals must be trained to implement DTT with high procedural fidelity.
“Given the adverse side effects of implementing DTT procedures at suboptimal levels, individuals must be trained to implement DTT with high procedural fidelity (LeBlanc et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LeBlanc et al., 2009 source
- Premisecitation
The implementation of DTT procedures is the most commonly targeted skill in the BST literature.
“Although the implementation of DTT procedures is the most commonly targeted skill in the BST literature (59% of articles reviewed by Gerencser et al., 2020, and 34% of articles reviewed by Marano et al., 2020), Leaf et al. (2019) is the only review summarizing the research on training individuals to implement DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
Leaf et al. (2019) is the only review summarizing the research on training individuals to implement DTT procedures.
“Although the implementation of DTT procedures is the most commonly targeted skill in the BST literature (59% of articles reviewed by Gerencser et al., 2020, and 34% of articles reviewed by Marano et al., 2020), Leaf et al. (2019) is the only review summarizing the research on training individuals to implement DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leaf et al. (2019) source
- Interpretationreasoning
The variation in procedures and different skills targeted across studies included in Leaf et al. (2019) make it difficult to draw clear conclusions for best practice recommendations unique to BST for training DTT procedures.
“Specifically, the variation in procedures (e.g., the inclusion of different or modified training components) and different skills targeted (e.g., implementation of stimulus preference assessments or managing challenging behavior) across included studies make it difficult to draw clear conclusions for best practice recommendations unique to BST for training DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Implementing DTT with suboptimal levels of procedural fidelity can produce delays in learning or interfere with the learner's skill acquisition.
“Implementing DTT with suboptimal levels of procedural fidelity can produce delays in learning or interfere with the learner's skill acquisition (e.g., Carroll et al., 2013;DiGennaro Reed et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Developing a self-guided instruction manual or computer-based training modules requires a significant investment upfront.
“First, developing a self-guided instruction manual or computer-based training modules requires a significant investment upfront (see Geiger et al., 2018, for a discussion on return on investment).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geiger et al., 2018 source
- Interpretationown data
A self-instruction manual may be an effective method for training some small proportion of individuals to implement DTT procedures.
“These results suggest that a self-instruction manual may be an effective method for training some small proportion of individuals to implement DTT procedures; however, as the studies used different self-instruction manuals and mastery criteria across different populations, it is difficult to determine the variables responsible for predicting who might benefit from this training method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Instructions provided in baseline or isolated as an intervention (i.e., self-instruction) have often been ineffective at improving overall DTT performance.
“This recommendation is based on data suggesting that instructions provided in baseline (see above) or isolated as an intervention (i.e., self-instruction) have often been ineffective at improving overall DTT performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The What Works Clearinghouse holds RCTs in higher regard than within-subject designs when determining the level of evidence for what works in education.
“In particular, the What Works Clearinghouse (2020) holds RCTs in higher regard than within-subject designs when determining the level of evidence for what works in education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites What Works Clearinghouse (2020)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
These alternative modalities might represent a reasonable replacement when a live trainer is not feasible.
“Therefore, these alternative modalities might represent a reasonable replacement when a live trainer is not feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Findings from Aljadeff-Abergel et al. (2017) indicate that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective at improving skills than feedback that was provided after the session.
“findings from Aljadeff-Abergel et al. (2017) indicate that feedback provided before the teaching session was more effective at improving skills than feedback that was provided after the session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017 source
- Interpretationcitation
In studies for which the mastery criterion was below 100%, participants may have mastered the training while consistently performing critical components of DTT incorrectly.
“In studies for which the mastery criterion was below 100%, participants may have mastered the training while consistently performing critical components of DTT incorrectly (Fienup & Carr, 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fienup & Carr, 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The feedback component has the greatest variety of variables that may influence its efficacy, including modality, content, frequency, and on whose behavior it is based.
“That said, the feedback component has the greatest variety of variables that may influence its efficacy, including its modality (i.e., vocal, written, visual), content (i.e., positive, constructive, general, behavior specific), frequency (i.e., timing, density, duration), and on whose behavior it is based (i.e., one's own, another's performance).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These data do not permit one to determine the conditions under which written and visual feedback modalities effectively teach staff to implement DTT procedures, given that they were often combined with other feedback modalities.
“Thus, these data do not permit one to determine the conditions under which written and visual feedback modalities effectively teach staff to implement DTT procedures, given that they were often combined with other feedback modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The primary benefit of self-practice and computer-based learning formats is that these reduce the reliance on the presence of a live trainer.
“The primary benefit of self-practice and computerbased learning formats is that these reduce the reliance on the presence of a live trainer (Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Computer-based interactive practice might be more effective than role plays with a confederate.
“computer-based interactive practice might be more effective than role plays with a confederate (e.g., Serna et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Serna et al., 2016 source
- Interpretationcitation
Integrating BST into a pyramidal training framework is a potential strategy for improving resource efficiency while ensuring effective outcomes.
“Another potential strategy for improving the resource efficiency of BST while also ensuring effective outcomes is to integrate this approach into a pyramidal training framework (Erath et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationown data
Although 67% of the studies assessed for generality, this proportion of studies is greatly reduced when the type of generality assessed is isolated.
“Thus, although 67% of the studies assessed for generality, this proportion of studies is greatly reduced when the type of generality assessed is isolated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Video models with voiceover instructions are more effective than live in vivo models.
“video models with voiceover instructions are more effective than live in vivo models (e.g., Vladescu et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vladescu et al., 2012 source
- Premisecitation
A relatively brief training video (with performance feedback as necessary) may be a promising approach that organizations can use to teach staff to function as peer trainers.
“Their findings suggest that a relatively brief training video (with performance feedback as necessary) may be a promising approach that organizations can use to teach staff to function as peer trainers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The current review indicated several strategies that may reduce the overall time or resources required to complete training, thus improving the efficiency of BST for DTT procedures.
“The current review indicated several strategies that may reduce the overall time or resources required to complete training, thus improving the efficiency of BST for DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Feedback delivered immediately before the session is a more effective method of feedback delivery than feedback delivered following the session.
“feedback delivered immediately before the session (as opposed to following the session) is a more effective method of feedback delivery (Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aljadeff-Abergel et al., 2017 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Pyramidal training represents a less resource-intensive approach, given that there is less reliance on one staff member to conduct all the training.
“This model represents a less resourceintensive approach, given that there is less reliance on one staff member to conduct all the training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A recent meta-analysis identified a statistically significant difference in procedural fidelity of DTT implementation between an active-BST phase and post-BST phase (or maintenance phase), suggesting participants' procedural fidelity declined after completion of training.
“This is especially important given that a recent meta-analysis identified a statistically significant difference in procedural fidelity of DTT implementation between an active-BST phase and post-BST phase (or maintenance phase), suggesting participants' procedural fidelity declined after completion of training (i.e., performance did not maintain; Fingerhut & Moeyaert, 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fingerhut & Moeyaert, 2022 source
- Interpretationreasoning
These formats make this approach easier to disseminate to other professionals and caregivers, including those in rural communities.
“In addition to reducing the resources required to conduct these training components, these formats make this approach easier to disseminate to other professionals and caregivers, including those in rural communities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The findings from this focused review of BST for training DTT procedures may generalize to other procedures or skill implementation.
“However, as BST is a systematic training program with standardized components (e.g., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback), the findings from this focused review of BST for training DTT procedures may generalize to other procedures or skill implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: BST is a systematic training program with standardized components (e.g., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback).
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 42
- May combine two claims. 51
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
“We followed the guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR; Tricco et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tricco et al., 2018 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationGiven the number of studies demonstrating the efficacy of BST for teaching DTT procedures, it is somewhat surprising that more have not conducted RCTs.
“Given the number of studies demonstrating the efficacy of BST for teaching DTT procedures, it is somewhat surprising that more have not conducted RCTs, as this is the gold standard for effectiveness research (Hariton & Locascio, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Hariton & Locascio, 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecent advancements have embedded instructions within video-model components as on-screen text or included voiceover instructions where a narrator described what was being demonstrated in the video.
“Further, recent advancements have embedded instructions within the video-model components as on-screen text (e.g., Spiegel et al., 2016) to enhance the saliency of important training features or included voiceover instructions where a narrator described what was being demonstrated in the video (e.g., Catania et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is an immense need for services and a limited number of qualified behavior analysts to provide training.
“However, with the immense need for services and the limited number of qualified behavior analysts to provide training (Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2023;Yingling et al., 2021;Yingling et al., 2022), it is no wonder that the major research trends we observed in the literature were related to improving the efficacy and efficiency of BST for training individuals to implement DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Behavior Analyst Certification Board, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yingling et al., 2021 source
- cites Yingling et al., 2022 source
The Introduction reports substantially increased demand for ABA services, and the Discussion says that the limited number of BCBAs in most counties would require caseloads above recommendations. The paper addresses shortages of providers serving children with ASD, but does not establish a shortage of behavior analysts specifically available to provide training. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWe closely followed the guidelines for the PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018).
“Although we closely followed the guidelines for the PRISMA-ScR (Tricco et al., 2018), we omitted several steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Tricco et al., 2018 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe types of DTT programs taught differed both within and across studies, and the three most commonly taught DTT programs were matching, auditory-visual conditional discrimination, and imitation.
“The types of DTT programs taught differed both within and across studies.The three most commonly taught DTT programs were matching (e.g., match to sample; Nosik & Williams, 2011), auditory-visual conditional discrimination (e.g., pointing to named objects; Thomson et al., 2012), and imitation (e.g., gross motor imitation; Nosik et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationWithin this literature, researchers evaluated the accuracy of two training procedures: the trainer's behavior during different components of the training program or the confederate's script-following during rehearsal.
“Within this literature, researchers evaluated the accuracy of two training procedures: (a) the trainer's behavior during different components of the training program (e.g., Clayton & Headley, 2019) or (b) the confederate's script-following during rehearsal (e.g., Fisher et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNeither performance on a quiz nor the fluency measured by the time it took to complete the quiz predicted performance scores.
“Results indicated that neither the performance on a quiz nor the fluency measured by the time it took to complete the quiz predicted performance scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the 51 studies, 47 (92%) used a within-subject experimental design and four (8%) used a between-groups design.
“Across the 51 studies, 47 (92%) used a within-subject experimental design and four (8%) used a between-groups design.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSix of the 31 (19%) participants in these studies reached DTT performance mastery criteria following experience with only the self-instruction manual, and the remaining 25 of 31 (81%) participants required additional training components to reach mastery criteria.
“Six of the 31 (19%) participants in these studies reached DTT performance mastery criteria following experience with only the self-instruction manual.The remaining 25 of 31 (81%) participants required additional training components (e.g., modeling, feedback) to reach mastery criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data40 out of the 51 (78%) studies used individual training formats, five (10%) used group formats, the remaining used individual and group formats (9%) or did not specify the format (4%).
“Further, 40 out of the 51 (78%) studies used individual training formats.Only five of the 51 (10%) studies used group training formats.The remaining studies used individual and group formats (9%) or did not specify the format (4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe remaining studies using a self-instruction manual did not provide sufficient details to judge whether enhanced components were used.
“The remaining studies using a self-instruction manual did not provide sufficient details to judge whether enhanced components were used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the studies using a within-subject design, 42 (89%) used some variation of a multiple-baseline design, multiple-probe design, or multiresponse baseline design, and five (12%) used a quasi-experimental, two-phase design.
“Of the studies using a within-subject design, 42 (89%) used some variation of a multiple-baseline design, multiple-probe design, or multiresponse baseline design, and five (12%) used a quasi-experimental, twophase design.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationSalem et al. (2009) included practice data sheets within their self-instruction manual, and Severtson and Carr (2012) reported using step-by-step nontechnical jargon, pictures depicting how to implement DTT, and detailed examples of procedures within their self-instruction manual.
“Similarly, Salem et al. (2009) included practice data sheets within their self-instruction manual and Severtson and Carr (2012) reported using (a) stepby-step nontechnical jargon, (b) pictures depicting how to implement DTT, and (c) detailed examples of procedures within their self-instruction manual.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Salem et al. (2009)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Severtson and Carr (2012) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenBaseline conditions typically varied as a function of the research question or independent variable.
“Baseline conditions typically varied as a function of the research question or independent variable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe reviewed studies reported demographic variables at the following rates: age 36/51 (71%), sex/gender 34/51 (67%), ethnicity/nationality 6/51 (12%), and socioeconomic status 3/51 (6%).
“Specifically, 36 out of 51 (71%) studies reported the age of participants, 34 out of 51 (67%) studies reported the sex/gender of participants, six out of 51 (12%) studies reported the ethnicity/nationality of participants, and only three out of 51 (6%) studies reported the socioeconomic status of participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the 51 studies, 31 (61%) included a combination of written plus vocal instructions, 15 (29%) included written instructions only, four (8%) included vocal instructions only, and one (2%) included either a combination of written plus vocal instructions or vocal instructions only.
“Across the 51 studies, 31 (61%) included a combination of written plus vocal instructions, 15 (29%) included written instructions only, four (8%) included vocal instructions only, and one (2%) included either a combination of written plus vocal instructions or vocal instructions only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross the 51 studies, participants were trained to implement DTT procedures that varied greatly by the number of steps, with the number of steps trained ranging from 4 to 45 among studies providing these details.
“Across the 51 studies, participants were trained to implement DTT procedures that varied greatly by the number of steps.Of the studies providing these details, the number of steps trained ranged from 4 to 45.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationEnhanced self-instruction manuals used easy-to-understand language, detailed examples of procedures, pictures depicting each step, and detailed data sheets.
“Enhanced self-instruction manuals used easy-to-understand language, detailed examples of procedures, pictures depicting each step, and detailed data sheets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBST components have been used to train various types of individuals (e.g., undergraduate students, clinical staff) across a wide range of ages (18-70 years) and settings (e.g., school, clinic, home).
“The findings indicate that BST components have been used to train various types of individuals (e.g., undergraduate students, clinical staff) across a wide range of ages (i.e., 18-70 years) and settings (e.g., school, clinic, home).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationOther studies did not combine rehearsal with feedback because they either did not include a feedback component at all or they did not need to program a feedback component to produce desirable performance.
“In contrast, the other studies did not combine rehearsal with feedback because they either (a) did not include a feedback component at all (Thomson et al., 2012;Zaragoza Scherman et al., 2008) or (b) they did not need to program a feedback component to produce desirable performance (Salem et al., 2009;Thiessen et al., 2009;Ward-Horner & Sturmey, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Thomson et al., 2012 source
- cites Zaragoza Scherman et al., 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Salem et al., 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSome training approaches embedded a self-practice component within the self-instruction component or included rehearsal with a computer program simulating a child's behavior, incorporating the practice aspect of the rehearsal component without requiring someone else to be present.
“For instance, some training approaches embedded a self-practice component within the selfinstruction component (e.g., Salem et al., 2009) or included rehearsal with a computer program simulating a child's behavior (e.g., Serna et al., 2016), either of which incorporates the practice aspect of the rehearsal component without requiring someone else to be present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVocal feedback was evaluated in isolation in 24 of the 44 (55%) studies and in combination with other modalities in 16 of the 44 (36%) studies, thus being represented in 40 of the 44 (91%) studies that incorporated feedback.
“Specifically, vocal feedback was evaluated in isolation (24 of the 44 [55%] studies) or in combination with other modalities (16 of the 44 [36%] studies), thus being represented in most studies (40 of the 44 [91%] studies) that incorporated feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationStudies have supplemented video models with interactive media and audio components, and some studies embedded quiz questions within online training modules.
“Studies have also supplemented video models with interactive media and audio components (e.g., embedded clickable text and exercises; Serna et al., 2016).Finally, some studies also embedded quiz questions within the online training modules (e.g., Nosik & Williams, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProcedural-fidelity data on the confederate's performance during the rehearsal component were often absent; only 52% of studies using a confederate reported procedural-fidelity data.
“Further, procedural-fidelity data on the confederate's performance during the rehearsal component were often absent (only 52% of studies using a confederate reported procedural-fidelity data).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone givenThe influence of BST mastery criteria on the short-and long-term maintenance of DTT procedures is unknown.
“Relatedly, the influence of BST mastery criteria on the short-and long-term maintenance of DTT procedures is unknown.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFeedback was the second most common component incorporated into BST used to teach DTT procedures, included within 86% of studies reviewed.
“Feedback was the second most common component incorporated into BST used to teach DTT procedures (included within 86% of studies reviewed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong studies using rehearsal, 17 of 41 (41%) conducted rehearsal with a trainer or trainee posing as a child confederate, 10 of 41 (24%) with a child, six of 41 (15%) as self-practice or via e-learning with a virtual child, six of 41 (15%) used a combination, and two of 41 (5%) did not describe their rehearsal conditions.
“Seventeen of the 41 (41%) studies conducted rehearsal with a trainer or trainee posing as a child confederate.Ten of the 41 (24%) studies conducted rehearsal with a child.Six of the 41 (15%) studies arranged the rehearsal component as either a self-practice session or offered via an e-learning platform with a virtual child.Six of 41 (15%) studies used some combination of the three aforementioned”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMost of the studies in this review set a global measure mastery criterion and did not report DTT steps performed with errors.
“Most of the studies in this review set a global measure mastery criterion and did not report DTT steps performed with errors (see Cook et al., 2015, for a demonstration of and discussion on how using global measures can mask critical performance errors).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly 19% of the total studies reviewed required a mastery criterion of 100%, and even fewer required this criterion across multiple consecutive sessions.
“Given that only 19% of the total studies we reviewed required a mastery criterion of 100% and even fewer required this criterion across multiple consecutive sessions, we suggest researchers replicate and extend the effects of different mastery criteria on the skill maintenance of DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe modality of social-validity data collection also differed across studies, with some using a face-to-face interview approach, whereas other approaches had participants complete an open-ended or closed-ended questionnaire on their own.
“The modality of social-validity data collection also differed across studies, with some using a face-to-face interview approach (e.g., McBride & Schwartz, 2003) to assess participant preference, whereas other approaches had participants complete an open-ended (e.g., Williams & Gallinat, 2011) or closed-ended (e.g., Likert-type scale measure; Fazzio et al., 2009) questionnaire on their own.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationVideo models with voiceover instruction and interactive computer-based training improved the integrity with which individuals implemented DTT procedures.
“For instance, video models with voiceover instruction (e.g., Catania et al., 2009) and interactive computer-based training (e.g., Pollard et al., 2014) improved the integrity with which individuals implemented DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThis finding is identical to the research themes in the general BST literature.
“This finding is identical to the research themes in the general BST literature (Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020;Gerencser et al., 2020;Marano et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe studies used different types of questions to assess for social validity, including questions about perceived effectiveness of training materials and BST training components, participant opinions about the training experience, participants' perceived confidence in their successful implementation of DTT posttraining, or open-ended questions directed at obtaining participant feedback on how the培训
“The studies used different types of questions to assess for social validity, including questions about the perceived effectiveness of training materials (Thiessen et al., 2009) and BST training components (Lerman et al., 2020), participant opinions about the training experience (Lerman et al., 2013), participants' perceived confidence in their successful implementation of DTT posttraining (Al-N”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWe are unaware of any studies that have compared the results of live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous methods or individual versus group instruction.
“we are unaware of any studies that have compared the results of (a) live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous methods or (b) individual versus group instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf the 34 studies conducting probes for generality, 25 (74%) assessed for generality across novel programs, 19 (56%) assessed for generality across novel learners, and two (6%) assessed for generality across novel settings.
“Of the 34 studies conducting probes for generality, 25 (74%) assessed for generality across novel programs, 19 (56%) assessed for generality across novel learners, and two (6%) assessed for generality across novel settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationComparison studies found little difference between live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous formats and individual versus group instruction.
“In addition, comparison studies found little difference between live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous formats and individual versus group instruction (e.g., Geiger et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne study conducted maintenance checks up to 25 weeks postmastery, and the next closest study conducted maintenance checks up to 16 weeks postmastery.
“One study conducted maintenance checks up to 25 weeks postmastery.The next closest study conducted maintenance checks up to 16 weeks postmastery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data10 of the 17 (59%) studies only performed one maintenance check, whereas the other seven (41%) conducted multiple maintenance checks over time.
“Additionally, 10 of the 17 (59%) studies only performed one maintenance check, whereas the other seven (41%) conducted multiple maintenance checks over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTime-to-completion data are lacking, and comparative studies are needed to demonstrate whether one approach is more efficient while still producing desirable outcomes.
“However, time-to-completion data are lacking, and comparative studies are needed to demonstrate whether one approach is, in fact, more efficient while still producing desirable outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe second and third authors independently reviewed each study and extracted data for each descriptive variable.
“The second and third authors independently reviewed each study and extracted data for each descriptive variable described above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRaters agreed on 100% of studies for inclusion.
“Raters agreed on 100% of studies for inclusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPractical constraints related to time and resources required for developing and administering evidence-based training may prevent adoption in practice.
“One possibility is that considerable practical constraints related to the time (e.g., the number of trials required to demonstrate performance mastery) and resources (e.g., use of training materials and the presence of an experienced trainer) required for developing and administering evidence-based training may prevent adoption in practice (Sherman et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherman et al., 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLeaf et al. (2019) considered all training approaches separately and did not conceptualize the components within the framework of BST.
“The results indicated robust literature on training individuals to implement DTT; however, Leaf et al. considered all training approaches separately (i.e., it did not conceptualize the components within the framework of BST).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Leaf et al. (2019) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataInterrater agreement for the search procedures was 100%.
“Interrater agreement was 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe asynchronous self-instruction approach represents a more time- and resource-efficient method, which translates to improved cost effectiveness.
“Therefore, this asynchronous approach represents a more time-and resource-efficient method, which translates to improved cost effectiveness (Marano et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marano et al., 2020 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAs video models do not require the presence of a trainer, they permit easy distribution of standardized training.
“As video models do not require the presence of a trainer, they permit easy distribution of standardized training (Gerencser et al., 2020;Marano et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationA self-instruction option may be desirable when clinics operate with low trainer-to-staff ratios.
“This option may be desirable when clinics operate with low trainer-to-staff ratios (Karsten et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karsten et al., 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataRaters agreed on all data extracted for 44 of 51 (86%) studies.
“After they completed an independent review and data extraction for each study, raters agreed on all data extracted for 44 of 51 (86%) studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInstruction components presented with a computer-based approach require that trainees have access to this technology.
“Finally, instruction components presented with a computerbased approach (e.g., Pollard et al., 2014) require that trainees have access to this technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pollard et al., 2014 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe single disagreement resulted from an oversight on the first author's behalf and did not require resolution or modification to the data-charting table.
“The first author reviewed the single disagreement and found it to result from an oversight on his behalf, which did not require any resolution or modification to the data-charting table.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataOverall, raters agreed on all data extracted from 9 out of 10 (90% agreement) studies and 139 out of 140 (99% agreement) variables assessed.
“Overall, raters agreed on all data extracted from 9 out of 10 (90% agreement) studies and 139 out of 140 (99% agreement) variables assessed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe first author randomly selected 10 (20%) studies to independently review and extract data for each descriptive variable.
“After completing this data-charting table, the first author randomly selected 10 (20%) studies to independently review and extract data for each descriptive variable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPerformance feedback is an often-researched independent variable within the staff training and organizational behavior management literature.
“Thus, performance feedback is an often-researched independent variable within the staff training and organizational behavior management literature (Alvero et al., 2001;Gravina et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent research suggests that requiring 100% mastery criteria may improve the maintenance of trained skills.
“Recent research suggests that requiring 100% mastery criteria may improve the maintenance of trained skills (Richling et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Richling et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA recent review of technology-based staff training procedures suggests incorporating voiceover instruction into video models may enhance participant mastery of trained skills.
“A recent review of technology-based staff training procedures suggests incorporating voiceover instruction into video models may enhance participant mastery of trained skills (Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationStaff preference for feedback may be idiosyncratic.
“Another implication is that staff preference for feedback may be idiosyncratic and that trainers should consider these preferences when designing training sessions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent outcomes from Simonian and Brand (2022) suggest that when learning a novel task, corrective feedback is more effective and preferred.
“and recent outcomes from Simonian and Brand (2022) suggest that when learning a novel task, corrective feedback is more effective (and preferred).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Simonian and Brand, 2022 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRequiring repeated rehearsals may not necessarily lead to higher fidelity or greater performance levels.
“This would be important to determine, given that some studies have found that requiring repeated rehearsals may not necessarily lead to higher fidelity or greater performance levels and fewer rehearsal opportunities may be sufficient and, ultimately, more efficient (Jenkins & DiGennaro Reed, 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jenkins & DiGennaro Reed, 2016 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBacotti et al. (2021) found that undergraduate students initially preferred feedback following each step while learning a task; however, as they acquired the skill, participant preference for feedback shifted to following the completion of the task.
“For instance, Bacotti et al. (2021) found that undergraduate students initially preferred feedback following each step while learning a task; however, as they acquired the skill, participant preference for feedback shifted to following the completion of the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bacotti et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFeedback timing is another characteristic that might influence the efficacy of performance feedback.
“Feedback timing is another characteristic that might influence the efficacy of performance feedback (Lechermeier & Fassnacht, 2018), and several recent examples outside of training DTT procedures might illuminate some interesting areas for future research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lechermeier & Fassnacht, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFewer rehearsal opportunities may be sufficient and more efficient.
“This would be important to determine, given that some studies have found that requiring repeated rehearsals may not necessarily lead to higher fidelity or greater performance levels and fewer rehearsal opportunities may be sufficient and, ultimately, more efficient (Jenkins & DiGennaro Reed, 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jenkins & DiGennaro Reed, 2016 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSuch training innovations may enhance participants' learning of the material and subsequent performance.
“Such training innovations may enhance participants' learning of the material and subsequent performance (Gerencser et al., 2020;Marano et al., 2020); however, the studies using these interactive media and audio components did not directly evaluate their utility compared with that of traditional training components (e.g., in-person modeling, video modeling without added interactive features; cf.Ge”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBlending teaching components and the self-paced nature of self-instruction manuals or computer-based training modules may allow for trainees to move more quickly through training, thus representing approaches that may be relatively more efficient.
“For instance, blending teaching components (e.g., modeling with voiceover instructions; Vladescu et al., 2012) and the self-paced nature of self-instruction manuals or computer-based training modules (e.g., Geiger et al., 2018) may allow for trainees to move more quickly through training, thus representing approaches that may be relatively more efficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough the repeated demonstration that BST can be used to train implementers in various DTT programming addresses the generality of these procedures, there is a need for more rigorous procedures that include explicit descriptions of how generality is programmed during training and studies that demonstrate multiple types of generality rather than targeting one feature.
“Although the repeated demonstration that BST can be used to train implementers in various DTT programming addresses the generality of these procedures, there is a need for more rigorous procedures that include explicit descriptions of how generality is programmed during training and studies that demonstrate multiple types of generality rather than targeting one feature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBST can be time intensive and resource intensive.
“That is, despite BST representing an evidence-based approach for training various skills (Shapiro & Kazemi, 2017), it can be time intensive (i.e., requires time to present training modules and practice opportunities until the desired mastery criterion is reached) and resource intensive (i.e., requires the presence of a trainer and various training materials).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBST represents an evidence-based approach for training various skills.
“That is, despite BST representing an evidence-based approach for training various skills (Shapiro & Kazemi, 2017), it can be time intensive (i.e., requires time to present training modules and practice opportunities until the desired mastery criterion is reached) and resource intensive (i.e., requires the presence of a trainer and various training materials).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shapiro & Kazemi, 2017 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIf more rigorous mastery criteria are associated with better performance maintenance, the time and resources invested in initial training may be justified.
“If more rigorous mastery criteria are associated with better performance maintenance, the time and resources invested in initial training may be justified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe other half of the studies (16 of the 34; 47%) did not have a baseline measure of performance to compare generality performance, which limits the authors' ability to determine the generality of these skills.
“Therefore, the other half of the studies (16 of the 34; 47%) did not have a baseline measure of performance to compare generality performance, which limits the authors' ability to determine the generality of these skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis training approach may present an unreasonable time or financial burden for some human service organizations, or some organizations may not have enough well-trained individuals to implement BST.
“As a result, this training approach may present an unreasonable time or financial burden for some human service organizations, or some organizations may not have enough welltrained individuals to implement BST (DiGennaro Reed et al., 2013;Gerencser et al., 2020;Shapiro & Kazemi, 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlternative training formats and feedback methods are equally effective and offer organization leaders various options when selecting practices for their training programs.
“This handful of comparison studies suggests that alternative training formats and feedback methods are equally effective and offer organization leaders various options when selecting practices for their training programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt may be possible to train relatively simple DTT steps through video modeling, but more complex steps may require more extensive in vivo training with feedback.
“For instance, it may be possible to train relatively simple DTT steps (e.g., reinforcer delivery) through video modeling, but more complex steps (e.g., error correction) may require more extensive in vivo training with feedback (Gerencser et al., 2020;Marano et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMarano et al. (2020) note that individual staff members may respond differently to various training procedures or prefer a particular training approach.
“Marano et al. (2020) note that individual staff members may respond differently to various training procedures or prefer a particular training approach; therefore, we recommend future studies continue to gather social-validity measures to understand the trainees' perspectives about their training experience and whether specific modalities are more or less preferred or perceived to be more or less”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marano et al., 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdvances in technology-based training procedures have demonstrated that they are as (if not more) effective than in vivo training methods.
“Although advances in technology-based training procedures have demonstrated that they are as (if not more) effective than in vivo training methods (see Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020, for a review), we are unaware of any studies that have compared the results of (a) live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous methods or (b) individual versus group instruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath & DiGennaro Reed, 2020 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe relative complexity of certain procedures being taught may directly dictate which training strategy practitioners should use.
“The relative complexity of certain procedures (e.g., the number or type of steps) being taught may directly dictate which training strategy practitioners should use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationErath et al. (2021) recently evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a technology-based pyramidal training approach to train staff to implement BST to teach job-related skills.
“Erath et al. (2021) recently evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a technology-based pyramidal training approach to train staff to implement BST to teach job-related skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erath et al., 2021 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningWe may have excluded the outcomes of other BST-component studies that teach other procedures.
“Given that our focus was so narrow, we may have excluded the outcomes of other BST-component studies that teach other procedures”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe scope of the review was limited to BST components used to train DTT procedures, excluding other procedures or skills that behavior-analytic service providers perform with or without consumers.
“The scope of our review was limited to BST components used to train DTT procedures, which excludes other procedures or skills that behavior-analytic service providers perform with (e.g., functional analysis procedures) or without consumers (e.g., data-based decision making).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationOther areas of research may have discovered advancements in BST components that should be adapted to train all behavior-analytic procedures or skills.
“other areas of research, like stimulus preference assessments (22.7% of articles reviewed in Gerencser et al., 2020, and 18.6% of articles reviewed in Marano et al., 2020), may have discovered advancements in BST components that should be adapted to train all behavior-analytic procedures or skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStimulus preference assessments comprised 22.7% of articles reviewed in Gerencser et al., 2020, and 18.6% of articles reviewed in Marano et al., 2020.
“like stimulus preference assessments (22.7% of articles reviewed in Gerencser et al., 2020, and 18.6% of articles reviewed in Marano et al., 2020)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningOur results may lead to inaccurate or incomplete assumptions about the usefulness of specific approaches.
“our results may lead to inaccurate or incomplete assumptions about the usefulness of specific approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWe did not register our search strategy and review procedures protocol.
“Second, we did not register our search strategy and review procedures protocol; however, it can be accessed in Supporting Information A.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningRestricting the scope of the review to only research relevant to BST components used for teaching DTT procedures does not allow for an evaluation of the generality of BST used for teaching other behavior-analytic procedures or skills.
“Additionally, restricting the scope of the review to only research relevant to BST components used for teaching DTT procedures does not allow for an evaluation of the generality of BST used for teaching other behavior-analytic procedures or skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenWe did not document the specific dates on which we conducted our searches.
“First, we did not document the specific dates on which we conducted our searches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningWe did not critically appraise the included sources of evidence.
“Third, we did not critically appraise the included sources of evidence; however, this step is optional and was not completed because it was irrelevant to our objectives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenWe did not conduct a quantitative analysis of the results from included studies, which limits some of the general conclusions on the efficacy and effectiveness of BST components used for teaching DTT procedures.
“Finally, we did not conduct a quantitative analysis of the results from included studies, which limits some of the general conclusions on the efficacy and effectiveness of BST components used for teaching DTT procedures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
A lack of clear guidance on developing and incorporating evidence-based staff training into practice is a barrier preventing organizations from implementing such training.
“Another potential barrier preventing organizations from implementing evidence-based staff training is the lack of clear guidance on developing and incorporating such training into practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
BST research seeks to determine the necessary and sufficient components required to produce performance mastery.
“Given that BST research seeks to determine the necessary and sufficient components required to produce performance mastery, future research should determine the minimum number of rehearsal opportunities needed to meet the mastery criteria.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Vocal feedback allows for the immediate delivery and subsequent discussion of the performance, but it requires the presence of a live trainer, which may not always be feasible.
“Although vocal feedback allows for the immediate delivery and subsequent discussion of the performance, it requires the presence of a live trainer, which may not always be feasible.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Written and visual feedback do not require the trainer and trainee to be present simultaneously, and vocal feedback is fleeting and may not be recalled as readily (or accurately), whereas written and visual feedback represent a permanent product that can be revisited.
“First, written and visual feedback do not require the trainer and trainee to be present simultaneously.Second, vocal feedback is fleeting and may not be recalled as readily (or accurately), whereas written and visual feedback represent a permanent product that can be revisited.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Feedback delivery typically requires the presence of an expert who can monitor the trainee's performance and remains available to deliver feedback promptly.
“Feedback delivery typically requires the presence of an expert who can monitor the trainee's performance and remains available to deliver feedback promptly.”
The paper relies on this without support.
BST is a systematic training program with standardized components (e.g., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback).
“as BST is a systematic training program with standardized components (e.g., instructions, modeling, rehearsal, and feedback)”
The paper relies on this without support.
Training formats such as computer-based training create new challenges related to the access to technology and skills required for staff and caregivers to engage with it and the up-front financial costs and skills required to use software and technology to develop such training.
“Despite the apparent advantages of these training formats, they also create new challenges related to the access to technology and skills required for staff and caregivers to engage with it and the up-front financial costs and skills required to use software and technology to develop such training.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reducing one resource may increase (at least temporarily) the reliance on other resources.
“In other words, reducing one resource may increase (at least temporarily) the reliance on other resources.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Comparison studies are both reported and said not to exist
MajorThe discussion says comparison studies found little difference between training formats and between individual and group instruction. A later practice-implications passage says the authors know of no studies comparing those same approaches.
“In addition, comparison studies found little difference between live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous formats and individual versus group instruction (e.g., Geiger et al., 2018).”
“we are unaware of any studies that have compared the results of (a) live synchronous and remote synchronous or asynchronous methods or (b) individual versus group instruction.”
Within-subject design percentage is overstated
MinorFive of the 47 within-subject studies is about 11%, not 12%. The two listed design counts otherwise add to 47.
Reported 12 · recomputed 10.638298
“Of the studies using a within-subject design, 42 (89%) used some variation of a multiple-baseline design, multiple-probe design, or multiresponse baseline design, and five (12%) used a quasi-experimental, twophase design.”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m18-0850 · Cited by 43,565 · see citing works
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-20-00167 · Cited by 7,751 · see citing works
SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS<sup>1</sup>
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91 · Cited by 3,935 · see citing works
AN IMPLICIT TECHNOLOGY OF GENERALIZATION <sup>1</sup>
Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349 · Cited by 3,351 · see citing works
Hariton, E., & Locascio, J. J. (2018) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15199 · Cited by 1,604 · see citing works
SOME STILL‐CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1987) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-313 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Discrete Trial Training in the Treatment of Autism
Smith, T. (2001) · Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/108835760101600204 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Staff Training: A Guide for Practitioners
Parsons, M. B., Rollyson, J. H., & Reid, D. H. (2012) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/bf03391819 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL SKILLS TRAINING ON STAFF IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCRETE‐TRIAL TEACHING
Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2004) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-535 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1300/j075v21n01_02 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
McEachin, J. J., & Leaf, R. B. (1999) · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Koegel, R. L., Russo, D. C., & Rincover, A. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-197 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR SKILLS TRAINING IN FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
Ward‐Horner, J., & Sturmey, P. (2012) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1339 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
VIDEO MODELING TO TRAIN STAFF TO IMPLEMENT DISCRETE‐TRIAL INSTRUCTION
Catania, C. N., Almeida, D., Liu‐Constant, B., & Reed, F. D. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-387 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Lafasakis, M., & Sturmey, P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.685-689 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
REDUCING STUDENT STEREOTYPY BY IMPROVING TEACHERS' IMPLEMENTATION OF DISCRETE‐TRIAL TEACHING
Dib, N. E., & Sturmey, P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.52-06 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Crockett, J. L., Fleming, R. K., Doepke, K. J., & Stevens, J. S. (2005) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.10.003 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Leblanc, M.-P., Ricciardi, J. N., & Luiselli, J. K. (2005) · Education and Treatment of Children · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Reporting of demographic variables in the <i>Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis</i>
Jones, S. H., St. Peter, C. C., & Ruckle, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.722 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
AN EVALUATION OF PROGRAMMED TREATMENT-INTEGRITY ERRORS DURING DISCRETE-TRIAL INSTRUCTION
Carroll, R. A., Kodak, T., & Fisher, W. W. (2013) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.49 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
A PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ERRORS OF COMMISSION DURING DISCRETE‐TRIAL TRAINING
Reed, F. D. D., Reed, D. D., Baez, C. N., & Maguire, H. (2011) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-611 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Lechermeier, J., & Faßnacht, M. (2018) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-018-0136-8 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
A Survey of Staff Training and Performance Management Practices: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Reed, F. D. D., & Henley, A. J. (2015) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-015-0044-5 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2007) · Research in Autism · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2007.04.002 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Enhancing the training integrity of human service staff using pyramidal behavioral skills training
Erath, T. G., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Sundermeyer, H. W., Brand, D., Novak, M. D., Harbison, M. J., & Shears, R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.608 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
McBride, B. J., & Schwartz, I. S. (2003) · Topics in Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.1177/027112140302300102 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Vladescu, J. C., Carroll, R., Paden, A., & Kodak, T. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-419 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
A Review of Training Strategies to Teach Individuals Implementation of Behavioral Interventions
Shapiro, M., & Kazemi, E. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2016.1267066 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Fisher, W. W., Luczynski, K. C., Hood, S. A., Lesser, A. D., Machado, M. A., & Piazza, C. C. (2014) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Effects of training and feedback on Discrete Trial Teaching skills and student performance
Downs, A., Downs, R. C., & Rau, K. (2008) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2007.05.001 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Pollard, J. S., Higbee, T. S., Akers, J. S., & Brodhead, M. T. (2014) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.152 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Effects of Positive and Negative Feedback Sequence on Work Performance and Emotional Responses
Choi, E., Johnson, D. A., Moon, K., & Oah, S. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2017.1423151 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Gravina, N., Villacorta, J., Albert, K., Clark, R., Curry, S., & Wilder, D. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2018.1454872 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Higbee, T. S., Aporta, A. P., Resende, A., Nogueira, M., Goyos, C., & Pollard, J. S. (2016) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.329 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Richling, S. M., Williams, W. L., & Carr, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.580 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Should You Order the Feedback Sandwich? Efficacy of Feedback Sequence and Timing
Henley, A. J., & Reed, F. D. D. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1093057 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Fisher, W. W., Luczynski, K. C., Blowers, A. P., Vosters, M. E., Pisman, M. D., Craig, A. R., Hood, S. A., Machado, M. A., Lesser, A. D., & Piazza, C. C. (2020) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.778 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Fetherston, A., & Sturmey, P. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.006 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The use of behavioral skills training to improve staff performance of discrete trial training
Clayton, M., & Headley, A. (2019) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1656 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
THE TRAINING AND VALIDATION OF YOUTH‐PREFERRED SOCIAL BEHAVIORS OF CHILD‐CARE PERSONNEL<sup>1</sup>
Willner, A. G., Braukmann, C. J., Kirigin, K. A., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M. (1977) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1977.10-219 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Global Measures of Treatment Integrity May Mask Important Errors in Discrete-Trial Training
Cook, J. E., Subramaniam, S., Brunson, L. Y., Larson, N. A., Poe, S. G., & Peter, C. C. S. (2015) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-014-0039-7 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Aljadeff-Abergel, E., Peterson, S. M., Wiskirchen, R. R., Hagen, K. K., & Cole, M. L. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2017.1309332 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Ward‐Horner, J. C., & Sturmey, P. (2008) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.268 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Lerman, D. C., Hawkins, L., Hillman, C. B., Shireman, M. L., & Nissen, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.196 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nosik, M. R., Williams, W. L., Garrido, N., & Lee, S. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.011 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Training Novice Instructors to Implement Errorless Discrete-Trial Teaching: A Sequential Analysis
Severtson, J. M., & Carr, J. E. (2012) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/bf03391820 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Component evaluation of a computer based format for teaching discrete trial and backward chaining
Nosik, M. R., & Williams, W. L. (2011) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.022 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Live training versus e‐learning to teach implementation of listener response programs
Geiger, K. B., LeBlanc, L. A., Hubik, K., Jenkins, S. R., & Carr, J. E. (2018) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.444 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Lerman, D. C., Hawkins, L., Hoffman, R., & Caccavale, M. N. (2013) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.50 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Common, E. A., & Lane, K. L. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-811122-2.00004-8 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Empirically Supported Staff Selection, Training, and Management Strategies
DiGennaro Reed, F. D., Hirst, J. M., & Howard, V. J. (2013) · Issues in Clinical Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6531-7_5 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Instructing university students to conduct discrete-trials teaching with children with autism
Fazzio, D., Martin, G. L., Arnal, L., & Yu, D. C. T. (2009) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2008.04.002 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Thiessen, C., Fazzio, D., Arnal, L., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., & Keilback, L. (2009) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445508327443 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
A review of the literature on staff training strategies that minimize trainer involvement
Marano, K. E., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., Sidener, T. M., & Cox, D. J. (2020) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1727 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Evidence-Based Application of Staff and Caregiver Training Procedures
Lerman, D. C., Leblanc, L. A., & Valentino, A. L. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420249-8.00014-9 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Eid, A. M., Aljaser, S. M., AlSaud, A. N., et al. (2017) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-016-0167-3 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gerencser, K. R., Akers, J. S., Becerra, L. A., Higbee, T. S., & Sellers, T. P. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-019-09332-x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Erath, T. G., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., & Blackman, A. L. (2021) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.827 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ryan, C. S., & Hemmes, N. S. (2005) · The Behavior Analyst Today · doi:10.1037/h0100052 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Maintenance of Parent-Implemented Discrete-Trial Instruction during Videoconferencing
Subramaniam, S., Brunson, L. Y., Cook, J. E., Larson, N. A., Poe, S. G., & St. Peter, C. C. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-016-9258-z · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Yingling, M. E., Ruther, M. H., & Dubuque, E. M. (2022) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05402-0 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
When do errors in reinforcer delivery affect learning? A parametric analysis of treatment integrity
Bergmann, S. C., Kodak, T. M., & Harman, M. J. (2021) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1002/jeab.670 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Yingling, M. E., Ruther, M. H., Dubuque, E. M., & Mandell, D. S. (2021) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613211002051 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Thomson, K. M., Martin, G. L., Fazzio, D., Salem, S., Young, K., & Yu, C. T. (2012) · Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.02.005 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The Effects of the Temporal Placement of Feedback on Performance
Bechtel, N. T., McGee, H. M., Huitema, B. E., & Dickinson, A. M. (2015) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/s40732-015-0117-4 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Telehealth and in‐person training outcomes for novice discrete trial training therapists
Sump, L. A., Richman, D. M., Schaefer, A. M., Grubb, L. M., & Brewer, A. T. (2018) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.461 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Training Issues Unique to Autism Spectrum Disorders
LeBlanc, L. A., Gravina, N., & Carr, J. E. (2009) · Applied Behavior Analysis for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0088-3_13 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Fienup, D. M., & Carr, J. E. (2021) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1827 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Leaf, J. B., Aljohani, W. A., Milne, C. M., Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2019) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-018-0152-6 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Williams, W., & Gallinat, J. (2011) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.570099 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Scaling Up Behavioral Skills Training: Effectiveness of Large-Scale and Multiskill Trainings
Courtemanche, A. B., Turner, L. B., Molteni, J. D., & Groskreutz, N. C. (2020) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-020-00480-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A brief review of technology‐based antecedent training procedures
Erath, T. G., & Reed, F. D. D. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.633 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Gerencser, K. R., Higbee, T. S., Contreras, B. P., Pellegrino, A. J., & Gunn, S. L. (2018) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-018-9308-9 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Lerman, D. C., Luck, K. M., Smothermon, S., Zey, B. A., Custer, T. N., & Smith, L. D. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-019-09341-w · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Vladescu, J. C., & Marano, K. E. (2021) · Organizational Behavior Management Approaches for Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.4324/9780429324840-8 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Assessing the efficacy of and preference for positive and corrective feedback
Simonian, M. J., & Brand, D. (2022) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.911 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Aherne, C. M., & Beaulieu, L. (2018) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1642 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Review and Discussion of Strategies to Address Low Trainer‐to‐Staff Ratios
Karsten, A. M., Axe, J. B., & Mann, C. C. (2015) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.1420 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Spiegel, H. J., Kisamore, A. N., Vladescu, J. C., & Karsten, A. M. (2016) · Child & Family Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1080/07317107.2016.1238690 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Using behavioral skills training to teach high school students to implement discrete trial training.
Dart, E. H., Radley, K. C., Furlow, C. M., et al. (2017) · Behavior Analysis Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/bar0000075 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Leblanc, L. A., Sump, L. A., Leaf, J. B., et al. (2019) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-019-00338-5 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hillman, C. B., Lerman, D. C., & Kosel, M. L. (2021) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.755 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Downs, A., & Downs, R. C. (2012) · Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/1088357612465120 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Parametric Analysis of Rehearsal Opportunities on Procedural Integrity
Jenkins, S. R., & DiGennaro Reed, F. D. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2016.1236057 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Identifying the relation between feedback preferences and performance
Bacotti, J. K., Grauerholz‐Fisher, E., Morris, S. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (2021) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.804 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Training Individuals to Implement Discrete Trials with Fidelity: A Meta-Analysis
Fingerhut, J., & Moeyaert, M. (2022) · Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/10883576221081076 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Serna, R. W., Foran, M. M., Cooke, C., Hurd, K. E., Tello, A. J., Vangapalli, R., & Hamad, C. D. (2016) · Journal of Special Education Technology · doi:10.1177/0162643416633334 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The Use of Behavioral Skills Training to Teach Components of Direct Instruction
Sherman, J., Richardson, J., & Vedora, J. (2021) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-021-00594-4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
The influence of observations and ratings on implementation of discrete trial instruction
Romer, K., Vladescu, J. C., Marano, K. E., Reeve, S. A., Sidener, T. M., & Campanaro, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.868 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Al-Nasser, T., Larry Williams, W., & Feeney, B. (2019) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-00282-w · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Daniels A. C., 2014, Performance management: Changing behavior that drives organization effectiveness (5th ed.)
- 10.1016/j.rasd.2008.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Salem S., 2009, A self‐instructional package for teaching university students to conduct discrete‐trials teaching with children with autism, Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 15, 21
- Zaragoza Scherman A., 2015, Online training of discrete‐trials teaching for educating children with autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary study, Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 21, 22
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Discrete‐trial teaching: A scoping review
Frank‐Crawford, M. A., Borrero, J. C., Fisher, A. B., Talhelm, P., & Fernandez, N. (2024) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.2012 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Paden, A. R., & Carroll, R. A. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.2928 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“These methods include behavioral skills training (Briggs et al., 2023; Reid et al., 2012; Sarokoff & Sturmey, 2004; Weston et al., 2020), video modeling with voice-over instruction (Catania et al., 2009; Moore & Fisher, 2007; Vladescu et al., 2012), and video self-monitoring procedures (Alexander…”
King, S. A., Glazek, C., Ross, M., & Green, M. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-025-09582-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The characteristics of specific procedures may also pose unique challenges to training and practice (Briggs et al., 2024; King & Burch, 2020).”
Evaluating feedback frequency preference and its relation to task performance
Thibodeaux, J. J., Taylor, P. M., Bacotti, J. K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.2932 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Call, N. A., Williams, C. L., Mevers, J. L., & Argueta, T. (2025) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.70028 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lionello‐Denolf, K. M., Eckerman, D. A., Hise, R., Pinzino, E., & Ray, R. D. (2025) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.70027 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mitchelson, B. V., Dozier, C. L., Leslie, S. C., & de Villegas, S. C. D. (2025) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.70035 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Effects of Training on Educator Implementation of Trial-Based Functional Analyses: A Review
Oliveira, J. P., Abuin, S., & Jones, S. H. (2025) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1007/s43494-025-00161-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“BST has been successfully used to train an assortment of socially significant skills (e.g., Discrete Trial Teaching, Briggs et al., 2023; behavior plan implementation, Hogan et al., 2014; interview skills, Stocco et al., 2017; implementing picture exchange systems, Rosales et al., 2009).”
Dai, M., Li, J., Chen, X., Chen, L., Tang, X., Yu, H., Qiu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Pediatrics · doi:10.3389/fped.2025.1708217 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Olaff, H. S., Koch, I. B., & Brand, D. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01094-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shea, P., Cote, E., & Carter, M. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01070-z · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Massey, C. C., Devine, S. M., & Haughney, K. L. (2025) · Inclusive Practices · doi:10.1177/27324745251338205 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Efektivitas Assertive Training Sebagai Strategi Transformatif Terhadap Self-Confidence Siswa
Anuar, A. B., Fahmi, A., Edison, E., et al. (2024) · JURNAL BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING AR-RAHMAN · doi:10.31602/jbkr.v10i2.17562 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
(2024) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.1000 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Further evaluation of the observer effect to train discrete‐trial instruction skills
McKeown, C. A., Williams, M. T., Quintero‐Giegeling, A. M., & Vollmer, T. R. (2026) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.70075
Riggs, P. E., Alber‐Morgan, S. R., Konrad, M., et al. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16071150
A Pyramidal Training Model to Teach Rapport Building Skills to Placement Students
Williams, M. J., Glecoff, A., Vandermeer, C., et al. (2026) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.70115
Improving Implementation Fidelity: The Station Rotation Model in Rural Special Education
Reedy, M., Wheeler, K., Troxell, M., et al. (2026) · Rural Special Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/87568705261453073
“BST has been shown to be an effective training method for teachers due to increases in implementation fidelity, near-mastery of skills performance, and maintenance of skills over time (Briggs et al., 2024; DeMuesy & Clark-Shofar, 2025; Fetherston & Sturmey, 2014; Smith et al., 2024).”
Abdel‐Jalil, A., Dauphinee, P. M., Cronk, S. L., Wood, A. M., Pane, H. M., & Vanderzell, M. L. (2026) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.70106
Evaluating the use of teach-back and behavioral skills training to improve employee performance
Pugliese, S. N., Liesfeld, J. E., Roberts, K. B., & Newcomb, E. T. (2026) · Journal of Organizational Behavior Management · doi:10.1080/01608061.2026.2644517
“As a result, some trainers may seek to streamline the use of BST by bypassing or leaving out certain steps (Briggs et al., 2024).”
Edelstein, M. L., Lent, M. C., Chunta, A. M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/10901027.2026.2642153
Clay, C. J., Gushchyan, A., Budde, J. R., Braga‐Kenyon, P., & Schenkkan, P. W. (2026) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.70082 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Telemedicine-based applications of ABA
Schieltz, K. M., McComas, J. J., & Beavis, H. S. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-22365-5.00021-4
Seward, R., & Redner, R. N. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01075-8
Göç, S., Yörük, S., & Sarı, O. T. (2025) · Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.33400/kuje.1534576
The evidence base for behavioral skills training
Sturmey, P., & Maffei‐Almodovar, L. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-16066-0.00005-6
Shapiro, M., Rios, D., & Kazemi, E. (2025) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91607-6_7
Ensuring Successful Transfer of Treatment to Community Settings: Comprehensive Discharge Planning
Sodano, S., Briggs, A. M., Loder‐Lafferty, B. H., et al. (2025) · Autism and child psychopathology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-91965-7_10
Self-citationA comprehensive narrative review on psychotherapies for patients with autism spectrum disorders
Kasaeiyan, R., Noor, I. M., & Burchi, E. (2024) · Mental Wellness · doi:10.4081/mw.2024.18
- Authors
- Briggs, A. M., Zohr, S. J., & Harvey, O. B.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Briggs, Adam M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-09-29
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-103
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W4387157119
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- West Virginia University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- behavioral skills training, discrete trial teaching, employee training, training protocols, modeling, rehearsal, feedback, training efficiency, autism intervention, best practices
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Humans, Learning, Teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review