Verification and Control of Hybrid Systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Authoring safety specifications is routine in automated controller design, and can frequently be achieved for both traditional software systems and domain-specific AI.
“Authoring safety specifications is routine in automated controller design (Tabuada, 2009), and can frequently be achieved for both traditional software systems and domainspecific AI.”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Tabuada, 2009
The formal verification of AI-enabled systems literature builds on more classic work on formal verification of control policies and classical expert systems, to develop methods for formal verification of neural networks and other machine learning systems.
“This builds on more classic work on formal verification of control policies (e.g., (Tabuada, 2009)) and classical expert systems (O'Keefe & O'Leary, 1993), to develop methods for formal verification of neural networks and other machine learning systems.”
From Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems (2024) · cites this paper as Tabuada, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Practical verification of decision-making in agent-based autonomous systems
Dennis, L. A., Fisher, M., Lincoln, N. K., Lisitsa, A., & Veres, S. M. (2016) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-014-0168-9 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Towards Guaranteed Safe AI: A Framework for Ensuring Robust and Reliable AI Systems
Dalrymple, D. "., Skalse, J., Bengio, Y., Russell, S., Tegmark, M., Seshia, S., Omohundro, S., Szegedy, C., Goldhaber, B., Ammann, N., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.06624 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tabuada, P.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tabuada, Paulo
- ORCID
- Tabuada, Paulo
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W2487779201
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Formal Methods in Verification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Embedded Systems Design Techniques
- Keywords
- hybrid systems, verification, control, finite automata, differential equations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
