The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 24 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
“They Must Have Done Something Wrong…”: The Construction of “Subversion” as a Social Category and the Reshaping of Identities Through Body and Dress (Argentina, 1976–1983)
Abstract
(Dialog between reporter Sandra de la Fuente and movie maker Fernando Trueba, who is currently making a film on the life and death of Brazilian piano player Tenório Cerqueira at the hands of Argentinean military forces – De la Fuente 2006, the translation is mine).
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The chapter argues that Argentina’s 1976–1983 military government constructed “subversion” as a stigmatized social category and materialized it through bodily appearance and dress, then used kidnapping, detention, torture, dress changes, and disappearance to reshape prisoners’ identities. It combines official discourse analysis, survivor testimony, and forensic clothing analysis to show how dress served both repression and, in forensic contexts, evidence of execution and identity erasure.
Key findings
- Official discourses divided Argentinians into military forces, “good” citizens, and “subversive” citizens; “subversion” was framed as terrorism/disease and stigmatized through appearance, first as military-style uniforms, weapons, and pamphlets, later as informal dress, untidiness, long hair, beards, jeans, and bright colors.
- In clandestine detention, military forces used enforced nakedness, torture, dress changes, blindfolds/hoods/chains, and code names to break identities and resistance; nakedness also prevented suicide and facilitated torture, while dress changes detached prisoners from prior life and prevented recognition.
- Forensic analysis of the EAAF collection from Lomas de Zamora cemetery examined 297 pieces of fabric and leather from 79 garments and shoes associated with 38 bodies; 12 bodies had clothes different from those witnesses said they wore when last seen, 8 had none, and 18 had few pieces.
- Garments showed bullet holes, tears, and possible blood stains; blindfolds and ties indicated victims were executed rather than killed in confrontations, and the “recovery process” at ESMA required prisoners, especially women, to alter appearance toward neatness and makeup as a sign of recovery.
Methods
- Qualitative historical-archaeological analysis combining official documentary sources (e.g., Junta Militar, Ejército Argentino, CONADEP), survivors’ testimonies, and an archaeological clothing collection.
- The clothing collection was recovered by the Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF) at Lomas de Zamora cemetery, Buenos Aires; witness descriptions of last-seen clothing were compared with garments found on bodies, alongside documentary, osteological, and genetic studies by EAAF.
- Theoretical framework uses “active appropriation” of Bourdieu, Foucault, Goffman, and others, with concepts of domination/resistance, social categorization, stigma, and dress as material culture/bodily practice.
Limitations
- The author states that discussion, rejection, and reinterpretation of official discourses are out of scope; future work should study experiences of men, women, elderly, young people, ethnic and religious minorities in clandestine detention centers, as well as persecuted groups’ acts of resistance.
- Evident from the text: the analysis relies on a specific forensic collection from Lomas de Zamora and selected testimonies/official sources, so findings may not generalize to all detention centers or all persecuted groups; the chapter focuses on military strategies rather than prisoners’ self-representations or resistance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
52 Own interpretation · 38 No basis given · 15 Sources not found · 10 Not checked yet · 5 No full text of the sources · 5 Own result
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On some occasions, prisoners were forced to attend the interrogation of their own relatives or friends.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Besides, on several occasions people sentenced to death were asked to wear clean clothes - different from those worn in the centers - under the promise that they would be released.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some other objects were intentionally placed to establish victims' guilt; for instance, weapons and pamphlets apparently connected to left-wing political parties.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the early days of the regime, military forces spread the idea that the members of left-wing political organizations could be clearly identified by their appearance.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
In the paper
“In 1977, the political advertisement 'Do you know where your son is now?' (Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología 2006, the translation is mine) intended to warn families against the proximity of 'subversion.'”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ministerio de Educación, Ciencia y Tecnología 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The collection under study was composed of several fragments of clothing (297 pieces of fabric and leather from 79 garments and shoes) associated with 38 bodies exhumed at Lomas de Zamora cemetery (Buenos Aires, Argentina).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When prisoners were released, military agents gave them clothes so they could leave the clandestine detention centers.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“On the contrary, most of them were killed as part of the 'fight against subversion' (Comandante General del Ejército 2006; Consejo de Defensa 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Comandante General del Ejército 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Consejo de Defensa 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“However, on several occasions, some details suggested that their casual appearance was just a disguise: '30 people in civilian clothes went down, although they wore military shirts under their jackets' (CONADEP 2005:23, the translation is mine).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CONADEP 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Countless testimonies state that - after being naked and tortured - prisoners were forced to dress other clothes but their own.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 30
- Probably not a substantial claim. 37
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“'Subversion' was associated with the 'international terrorism' promoted by the 'faithless and antichristian Marxism' (Asociación Patriótica Argentina 1978). It was also thought to be a disease which affected people's bodies (Schindel 2000).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Asociación Patriótica Argentina 1978
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Schindel 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These garments were obtained from other prisoners or the looting of domestic units”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prisoners participating in the 'recovery process' had to show - especially in the case of women - significant changes in their appearance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although they were part of the security forces, the kidnappers did not wear uniforms: '…several men broke into my house dressing civilian clothes; they were heavily armed and they told us they served the Navy and the Federal Police…' (CONADEP 2005:21, the translation is mine).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CONADEP 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military agents and other prisoners supplied everything needed for the transformation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Survivors frequently rejected dress expressions considered to be 'subversive' by dominant discourses - including certain kinds of clothes and haircuts.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As any other disease, 'subversion' was supposed to have specific symptoms. Most of them apparently affected people's appearance.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Argentinean military government considered that the social body was composed of different organs, represented by different social groups. If one of those organs showed signs of malfunction, then the whole social body could become sick.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to official discourses, uniforms were necessary to distinguish 'subversive' individuals from the rest of the population.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
In the paper
“'Subversive' citizens threatened the reconstruction of the 'greatness of the republic' (Junta Militar 1980), expressing ideological and practical opposition to the rules and living conditions in the country.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Junta Militar 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Released prisoners were warned that they would be watched by 'security forces.'”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once the process of categorization was set in motion, one of the main goals of the military regime was to identify and punish the individuals suspected of being 'subversive.'”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the military forces, 'subversive' people frequently looked untidy and dirty.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As mentioned above, prisoners were taken blindfolded or tied with their own clothes to secret locations.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the end of the military dictatorship, some clandestine detention centers - such as the ESMA institutionalized the 'recovery process.'”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tabiques were blindfolds or simple pieces of fabric used to cover people's eyes. During kidnapping, they were frequently made of victims' clothes, such as shirts and sweaters.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In exchange for their services, they were promised an immediate improvement in their living conditions and a future possibility of release.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Survivors' testimonies and forensic evidence show that the desaparecidos were frequently shot in executions, thrown from airplanes into the Río de la Plata or tortured to death in clandestine detention centers.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is worth noting the large number of holes found in some garments.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Kidnapping usually took place at the victim's house. It was carried out by an armed group - frequently called patota or grupo de tareas (gang or task group) - who identified themselves as military agents.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military discourses also stressed that uniforms were key to distinguish among left-wing parties - such as Montoneros, ERP and others. In the same way, badges were considered useful to identify ranks and hierarchies within political organizations.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, the very few prisoners who entered what military authorities called the 'recovery process' were expected to reborn as 'useful citizens.'”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
In the paper
“'Museums of subversion' made use of this idea. There, Argentinean citizens were taught several strategies to recognize their 'enemies,' exaggerating and caricaturing their bodily image (Pigna and Seoane 2006).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Pigna and Seoane 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, they were required to collaborate in different activities at clandestine detention centers (including maintenance and intelligence).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A short time later, the government understood that 'subversion' did not exclusively involve 'guerrilla' men/women who openly participated in political organizations. On the contrary, it also included seemingly harmless people - such as students, teachers and priests.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Nakedness was widely used as a means of torture.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, they were shot in fake confrontations with security forces, and entered the morgue as 'NN' or 'no-name' bodies.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although they did not have a trial, prisoners were sent to clandestine detention centers where they were held captive for days, months or even years.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military agents attempted to tell prisoners that the people they loved were in danger, and that the only way to save them was to obey.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After the coup, some guerrilla organizations decided to withdraw from public life. Maybe, their attempts to hide from the military government spread the idea that 'subversion' could be anywhere.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For military agents, 'subversion' and its associated bodily practices were responsible for subjecting people to different forms of punishment, only mediated by torturers' actions. In this way, victims were found guilty of their own pain.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once again, prisoners faced the possibility of becoming stigmatized individuals.”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“In Western society, vision has been historically connected to contemplation and abstraction.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Thomas 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence, they became tied to the absolute presence of horror and pain.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wearing clothes which were not theirs only made them look worse.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is rather unbelievable that persecuted people would have dressed like this -doing so would have rendered them identifiable and punishable targets.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military style clothing -including combat dress, boots, and badges - made 'good' citizens think 'subversive' people were similarly organized to the army forces. As a consequence, they were considered to be part of a 'fair war' which should not be confused with a 'dirty' one; that is to say, with the intervention of state terrorism against an unprotected population.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without a doubt, they account for the cruelty of the murderers.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Civilian clothes were 'misidentifying' symbols. According to Goffman, these symbols are responsible for breaking the coherence between 'virtual social identity' - the categories and attributes we expect to find in people - and 'real social identity' - the categories and attributes people actually possess. For this reason, witnesses (such as neighbors and relatives) had difficulties identifying”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Goffman
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Those who play the role of watching have the opportunity to exercise control over objects which can - in capitalist terms - be possessed (Thomas 2001).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Thomas 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These circumstances made me think of the strategies the military forces used to destroy or hide the evidence of their crimes.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Death and the loss of corporeality threaten personal relationships.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tarlow 2002 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These circumstances only increased the pain caused by political repression in Argentina.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The impossibility of finding and identifying the bodies causes anxiety.
In the paper
“Naked bodies made it difficult for victims to recognize themselves and others. In Western society, individual identities reside in bodies (Tarlow 2002). If bodies suffered significant changes in clandestine detention centers, then prisoners' identities and the relationships among them could blur or 'disappear.'”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tarlow 2002 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
In the paper
“Some societies believe that people's identities extend beyond the physical boundaries of the body, including the community, the environment and some material belongings (Becker 1995).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Becker 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“One of the purposes of wearing uniforms is to suppress individual identities (Anta 2004).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anta 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Military forces' attempts to destroy people's identities were essential to discourage any form of resistance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, military forces used these strategies to perpetuate victims' disappearance.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Garments also help archaeologists to construct a material memory of genocide.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Blindfolds and ties proved that victims were not involved in confrontations with military forces, but they were simply executed (Fig. 7.2).”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These strategies frequently made people reject and denounce alternative ways of action and thinking.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the military forces, when prisoners were naked they lost every trace of their 'subversive' character. In this way, they became subjected individuals.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
In the paper
“In short, the Brazilian musician was arrested and murdered '…because of his appearance. He had long hair, and he wore a beard and glasses. He was the portrait of a leftist intellectual' (De la Fuente 2006, the translation is mine).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites De la Fuente 2006
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From this perspective, it represents a necessary tool to gain knowledge through experience.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the obvious differences, the kidnapping of people during the most recent dictatorship in Argentina had some similarities to these rituals. Repressive strategies intended to erase people's past - as it was supposedly connected to 'subversion.'”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During kidnapping/detention, the condition of prisoners could no longer be grasped by the ordinary categories of the social structure. Death perpetuated this situation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These practices were subsequently reproduced in social life.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As mentioned above, there is a close connection between dress and identity.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The physical appearance of prisoners was completely affected by torture and inhuman living conditions.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this way, military forces intended to destroy the social category they had previously defined; in other words, 'subversion'.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The documentary sources and survivors' testimonies used in the study accurately report the discourses and events they describe.
“Survivors' testimonies and fragments of clothing recovered by the Argentinean Forensic Anthropology Team provide the evidence needed to achieve this goal.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The study of corporeality and material culture can contribute to broadening the understanding of repression in Argentina and other Latin American countries.
“This research attempts to broaden the understanding of repression in Argentina and other Latin American countries, stressing the contribution that the study of corporeality and material culture could make to the subject.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Torture changes physical constitution, leaving perceptible traces on people's bodies - scars and burns, among others.
“Torture changes physical constitution, leaving perceptible traces on people's bodies - scars and burns, among others.”
The paper relies on this without support.
We often feel that the clothes we wear constitute an extension of ourselves.
“For this reason, we often feel that the clothes we wear constitute an extension of ourselves.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In Western society, identities reside in individual bodies.
“In Western society, identities reside in individual bodies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The impossibility of finding and identifying the bodies causes anxiety.
“The impossibility of finding and identifying the bodies causes anxiety.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“They gave two shows, on March 17 and 18, two days before the coup.”
Reported 2 · recomputed 6
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M., & Butler, J. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.2307/1395391 · Cited by 29,314
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1264 · Cited by 7,748
Foucault, M., & del Camino, A. G. (1978) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 2,274
Estigma: La identidad deteriorada
Moreno, E. G. (2009) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 1,027
Fashion, Culture, and Identity
Davis, F. (1992) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226167954.001.0001 · Cited by 1,026
Hodder, I. (2012) · Cited by 923
The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory
Entwistle, J. (2000) · Cited by 874
Jenkins, R. (1952) · Taylor & Francis eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203292990 · Cited by 671
Fashion and Its Social Agendas
Crane, D. (2000) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226924830.001.0001 · Cited by 488
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Actis, M., Aldini, C., Gardella, L., Lewin, M., and Tokar, E., 2006, Ese Infierno. Conversaciones de Cinco Mujeres Sobrevivientes de la ESMA. Altamira, Buenos Aires.
- Acuto, F. and Gifford, Ch., 2005, Lugar, Arquitectura y Narrativas de Poder: Experiencia y Percepción en los Centros Inkas de los Andes del Sur. Arqueología Suramericana 3(2):135–161.
- Armus, D., 2000, El Descubrimiento de la Enfermedad como Problema Social. En Nueva Historia Argentina, Vol. 5, El Progreso, la Modernización y sus Límites (1880–1916), edited by M. Lobato, pp. 507–551. Sudamericana, Buenos Aires.
- Asociación Patriótica Argentina, 1978, Argentina y sus Derechos Humanos. Libertad, Buenos Aires.
- Asociación Unidad Argentina, 1998, Subversión. La Historia Olvidada. Documento Histórico. AUNAR, Olivos.
- Beaudry, M., Cook, L., and Mrozowski, S., 1991, Artifacts and Active Voices. Material Culture as Social Discourse. In The Archaeology of Inequality, edited by R. McGuire and R. Paynter, pp. 150–191, Blackwell, London.
- Bourdieu, P., 1989, O Poder Simbólico. Bertrand Brasil, Río de Janeiro.
- Diana, M., 2006, Mujeres Guerrilleras. Sus Testimonios en la Militancia de los Setenta. Booket, Buenos Aires.
- Edholm, F., 1993, The View from Below: Paris in the 1880s. In Landscapes: Politics and Perspectives, edited by B. Bender, pp. 139–168. Berg, Oxford.
- Flügel, J., 1964, Psicología del Vestido. Paidós, Buenos Aires.
- Foucault, M., 1980, Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings, Pantheon Books, New York, NY.
- Kwint, M., 1999, Introduction: The Physical Past. In Material Memories, edited by M. Kwint, C. Breward and J. Aynsley, pp. 1–16. Berg, Oxford.
- Le Breton, D., 1995, Antropología del Cuerpo y la Modernidad. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
- Leone, M., 1988, The Georgian Order as the Order of Merchant Capitalism in Annapolis, Maryland. In The Recovery of Meaning. Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, edited by M. Leone y P. Potter, pp. 235–261. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
- McGuire, R., 1988, Dialogues with the Dead. Ideology and the Cemetery. In The Recovery of Meaning, edited by M. Leone y P. Potter, pp. 435–480. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
- Norverto, L., 2004, Limpios, Prolijos y Saludables: La Concepción de Higiene en la Infancia a Fines del 1800. In Higienismo, Educación y Discurso en la Argentina (1870–1940), edited by M. Di Liscia y G. Salto, pp. 89-109. Universidad Nacional de la Pampa, Santa Rosa.
- Potteiger, M. and Purinton, J., 1998, Landscape Narratives. Wiley, New York, NY.
- Rella, F., 2004, En los Confines del Cuerpo. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
- Saulquin, S., 2006, Historia de la Moda Argentina. Del Miriñaque al Diseño de Autor. Emecé, Buenos Aires.
- Senatore, M., 2004, Discursos Ilustrados y Sociedad Moderna en las Colonias Españolas de Patagonia (Siglo XVIII). In Arqueología Histórica Sudamericana; Los Desafíos del Siglo XXI, edited by P. Funari and A. Zarankin, pp. 31–56. Uniandes, Bogotá.
- Squicciarino, N., 1990, El Vestido Habla: Consideraciones Psico-Sociológicas sobre la Indumentaria. Cátedra, Barcelona.
- Stewart, S., 1999, Prologue: From the Museum of Touch. In Material Memories, edited by M. Kwint, C. Brewer and J. Aynsley, pp. 17–36. Berg, Oxford.
- Turner, V., 1988, El Proceso Ritual. Taurus, Madrid.
- Vigarello, G., 2005, Corregir el Cuerpo. Historia de un Poder Pedagógico. Nueva Visión, Buenos Aires.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Archaeologies of the Contemporary World
Harrison, R., & Breithoff, E. (2017) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041401 · Cited by 66
Arqueología y dictaduras en el Perú del siglo XX: una introducción
Gonzales-Panta, A. (2023) · Discursos del Sur revista de teoría crítica en Ciencias Sociales · doi:10.15381/dds.n11.25862 · Cited by 1
Rozas-Krause, V. (2024) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/17506980241247273
Metadata
- Authors
- Salerno, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Salerno, Melisa A.
- ORCID
- Salerno, Melisa A.
- Venue
- Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2009
- Pages
- 81-103
- ISSN
- 1574-0439 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W257734749
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology/Contributions to global historical archaeology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Argentine historical studies
- Keywords
- subversion, Argentine military dictatorship, stigmatization, disappearance, political repression, body and clothing, embodiment, material culture, clandestine detention centers, forensic anthropology, survivor testimony, identity construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “They Must Have Done Something Wrong…”: The Construction of “Subversion” as a Social Category and the Reshaping of Identities Through Body and Dress (Argentina, 1976–1983). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_7
- The paper
- Salerno, M. A. (2009). “They Must Have Done Something Wrong…”: The Construction of “Subversion” as a Social Category and the Reshaping of Identities Through Body and Dress (Argentina, 1976–1983). Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0679-3_7
