CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Aesthetic Corpse in Nineteenth-Century Britain

Tarlow, Sarah·2002·Thinking through the Body
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-0693-5_5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-0693-5_5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aries, P. (1981) The hour of our death, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  2. Barrett, J. (1988) ‘The living, the dead and the ancestors: late Neolithic and early Bronze Age mortuary practices’, in J. Barrett and I. Kinnes (eds) The archaeology of context in theNeolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends, pp. 30–41, Sheffield: Department of archaeology and prehistory.
  3. Bashford, L. and T. Pollard (1998) In the burying place — the excavation of a Quaker burial ground, in M. Cox (ed.) Grave concerns: death and burial in England 1700–1850, pp. 154–66, York: CBA.
  4. Bauman, Z. (1992) Mortality, immortality and other life strategies, Cambridge: Polity.
  5. Bellantoni, N. and G. Cooke (1997) ‘Forensic archaeology at the Chauncey family crypt, Indian Hill cemetery, Middletown, Connecticut’, in D. Poirier and N. Bellantoni (eds) Inremembrance: archaeology and death, pp. 173–83, Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.
  6. Binford, L. (1971). ‘Mortuary Studies: their study and their potential’, in J. Brown (ed.) Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices, pp. 6–29, Memoir 25, Society for American Archaeology.
  7. Boyle, A. and G. Keevill (1998) To the praise of the dead, and anatomie: the analysis of post-medieval burials at St Nicholas, Sevenoaks, Kent, in M. Cox (ed) Grave concerns:death and burial in England 1700–1850, pp. 85–99, York: CBA.
  8. Brown, J. (1981) ‘The search for rank in prehistoric burial’, in R. Chapman, I. Kinnes and K. Randsborg (eds) The archaeology of death, pp. 25–38, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of sex, London and New York: Routledge
  10. Connor, L. (1995) ‘The action of the body on society: washing a corpse in Bali’, Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute 1, 3: 537–59. · DOI
  11. Cox, M. (1998) ‘Eschatology, burial practice and continuity: a retrospection from Christ Church, Spitalfields’, in M. Cox (ed) Grave concerns: death and burial in England 1700–1850, pp. 112–25, York: CBA.
  12. Cox, M. and G. Stock (1995) ‘Nineteenth century Bath-stone walled graves at St Nicholas’s church’, Bathampton, Somerset Archaeology and Natural History Society 138: 131–50.
  13. Elias, N. (1978 [1939]) The civilising process, vol 1: the history of manners, Oxford: Blackwell
  14. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and self identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Gittings, E. (1984) Death, burial and the individual in early modern England, London and Sydney: Croome Helm.
  16. Goffman, E. (1969) The presentation of self in everyday life, Harmondsworth: Penguin
  17. Janaway, R. (1993) ‘The textiles’, in J. Reeve and M. Adams The Spitalfields Project volume1, The Archaeology: Across the Styx, pp. 160–7, York: CBA.
  18. Janaway, R. (1998) ‘An introductory guide to textiles from the eighteenth and nineteenth century burials’, in M. Cox (ed) Grave concerns: death and burial in England 1700–1850, pp. 17–32, York: CBA.
  19. Kus, S. (1992) ‘Towards an archaeology of body and soul’, in J-C Gardin and C. Peebles (eds) Representations in archaeology, pp. 168–77, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  20. Levinas, E. (1981) [1974] Otherwise than being, or beyond essence, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff (trans. Alphonso Linges).
  21. Litten, J. (1991) The English way of death: the common funeral since 1450, London: Robert Hale.
  22. Litten, J. (1998) ‘The English funeral 1700–1850’, In M. Cox (ed) Grave concerns: death andburial in England 1700–1850, pp. 3–16, York: CBA.
  23. Mellor, P. and C. Shilling (1993) ‘Modernity, self-identity and the sequestration of death’, Sociology 27(3): 411–31 · DOI
  24. Parker Pearson, M. (1982) ‘Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study’, in I. Hodder (ed) Symbolic and structural archaeology, pp. 99–114, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  25. Reeve, J. and M. Adams (1993) The Spitalfields Project volume 1, The Archaeology: Acrossthe Styx York: CBA.
  26. Rosaldo, R (1984) ‘Grief and a headhunters rage: on the cultural force of emotions’, in E. Bruner (ed.) Text, play and story: the construction and reconstruction of self and society, pp. 178–95, Illinois: Waveland Press.
  27. Rosaldo, R. (1989) Culture and Truth: the remaking of social analysis, Boston: Beacon Press.
  28. Serematakis, C. (1991) The last word: women, death and divination in inner Mani, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  29. Shilling, C. (1993) The body and social theory, London: Sage.
  30. Stearns, P. and M. Knapp (1996) ‘Historical perspectives on grief’, in R. Harr and W.G. Parrott (eds) The emotions: social, cultural and biological dimensions, pp. 132–50, London: Sage.
  31. Tarlow, S. 1999. Bereavement and commemoration: an archaeology of mortality, Oxford: Blackwell.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Tarlow, S.
Venue
Thinking through the Body
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2002
Pages
85-97
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-0693-5_5
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Aesthetic Corpse in Nineteenth-Century Britain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4615-0693-5_5
The paper
Tarlow, S. (2002). The Aesthetic Corpse in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Thinking through the Body. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0693-5_5