Cited by 161Hallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and PsychiatryHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dictionary of Hallucinations

Blom, Jan Dirk·2010·Springer eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-1223-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Blom, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Blom, Jan Dirk
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2010
OpenAlex
W601952952
Cited by
161
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.03
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
hallucinations, psychiatric terminology, psychopathology, history of psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review