The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Dynamics of a Shaker Landscape in Canterbury, New Hampshire
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, archaeological research at utopian communities has found evidence of complementary and cooperative gender roles, identities, and power dynamics, while at the same time the Shakers and some other utopias also practiced stated ideologies of gender segregation (K.McBride, 2010a, b;Spencer-Wood, 2006;Starbuck & Dennis, 2010).”
From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Starbuck & Dennis, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa and Murray Silverstein, et al. 1977 A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Andrews, Edward Deming 1963 People Called Shakers. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
- Borges, Richard C. 1988 The Canterbury Shakers: A Demographic Study. The University of New Hampshire, Durham, Ph.D. Dissertation.
- Campion, Nardi Reeder 1990 Mother Ann Lee: Morning Star of the Shakers. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
- Emlen, Robert P. 1987 Shaker Village Views. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
- Hayden, Dolores 1976 Seven American Utopias: The Architecture of Communitarian Socialism, 1790–1976. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge.
- Morse, Flo 1980 The Shakers and the World’s People. Dodd, Mead & Company, New York.
- Newman, Cathy 1989 “The Shakers’ Brief Eternity.” National Geographic 176(3):302–325.
- Savulis, Ellen-Rose 2003 “Zion’s Zeal: Negotiating Identity in Shaker Communities.” In Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, edited by D. L. Rotman and E. Savulis, pp. 160–189. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
- Spencer-Wood, Suzanne M. 2006 “A Feminist Theoretical Approach to the Historical Archaeology of Utopian Communities.” Historical Archaeology 40(1):152–185. · DOI · Paper page
- Starbuck, David R. 1981 Canterbury Shaker Village: An Historical Survey, Volume 2. University of New Hampshire, Durham.
- 1986 “The Shaker Mills in Canterbury, New Hampshire.” IA, The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology 12(1):11–38.
- 1990a “Canterbury Shaker Village: Archeology and Landscape.” The New Hampshire Archeologist 31(1):1–163.
- 1990b “Those Ingenious Shakers!” Archaeology 43(4):40–47.
- 1998 “New Perspectives on Shaker Life.” Expedition 40(3):3–16.
- 1999 “Latter-Day Shakers.” Archaeology 52(1):28–29.
- 2000 “Waiting for the Second Coming: The Canterbury Shakers, an Archaeological Perspective on Blacksmithing and Pipe Smoking.” Northeast Historical Archaeology 29:83–106. · DOI
- 2004 Neither Plain Nor Simple. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
- Starbuck, David R., and Margaret Supplee Smith, eds. 1979 Historical Survey of Canterbury Shaker Village. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Starbuck, David R., and Scott T. Swank 1998 A Shaker Family Album: Photographs from the Collection of Canterbury Shaker Village. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
- Stein, Stephen J. 1992 The Shaker Experience in America. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
- Swank, Scott T. 1999 Shaker Life, Art, and Architecture. Abbeville Press, New York.
- Wergland, Glendyne R. 2006 One Shaker Life: Isaac Newton Youngs, 1793–1865. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
- Wittenstein, Kate 1979 “Shakers and Society: Theory and Practice of the Equality of the Sexes in the Nineteenth Century.” In Historical Survey of Canterbury Shaker Village, edited by D. R. Starbuck and M. S. Smith, pp. 215–227. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spencer-Wood, S. M., & Trunzo, J. M. C. (2022) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-022-09442-5 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Starbuck, D. R., & Dennis, P. J.
- Venue
- Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes
- Publisher
- Springer New York
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 233-249
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review