Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Dynamics of a Shaker Landscape in Canterbury, New Hampshire

Starbuck, David R., Dennis, Paula J.·2010·Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-1501-6_10

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Alexander, Christopher, Sara Ishikawa and Murray Silverstein, et al. 1977 A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York.
  2. Andrews, Edward Deming 1963 People Called Shakers. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.
  3. Borges, Richard C. 1988 The Canterbury Shakers: A Demographic Study. The University of New Hampshire, Durham, Ph.D. Dissertation.
  4. Campion, Nardi Reeder 1990 Mother Ann Lee: Morning Star of the Shakers. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  5. Emlen, Robert P. 1987 Shaker Village Views. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  6. Hayden, Dolores 1976 Seven American Utopias: The Architecture of Communitarian Socialism, 1790–1976. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge.
  7. Morse, Flo 1980 The Shakers and the World’s People. Dodd, Mead & Company, New York.
  8. Newman, Cathy 1989 “The Shakers’ Brief Eternity.” National Geographic 176(3):302–325.
  9. Savulis, Ellen-Rose 2003 “Zion’s Zeal: Negotiating Identity in Shaker Communities.” In Shared Spaces and Divided Places: Material Dimensions of Gender Relations and the American Historical Landscape, edited by D. L. Rotman and E. Savulis, pp. 160–189. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
  10. Spencer-Wood, Suzanne M. 2006 “A Feminist Theoretical Approach to the Historical Archaeology of Utopian Communities.” Historical Archaeology 40(1):152–185. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Starbuck, David R. 1981 Canterbury Shaker Village: An Historical Survey, Volume 2. University of New Hampshire, Durham.
  12. 1986 “The Shaker Mills in Canterbury, New Hampshire.” IA, The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology 12(1):11–38.
  13. 1990a “Canterbury Shaker Village: Archeology and Landscape.” The New Hampshire Archeologist 31(1):1–163.
  14. 1990b “Those Ingenious Shakers!” Archaeology 43(4):40–47.
  15. 1998 “New Perspectives on Shaker Life.” Expedition 40(3):3–16.
  16. 1999 “Latter-Day Shakers.” Archaeology 52(1):28–29.
  17. 2000 “Waiting for the Second Coming: The Canterbury Shakers, an Archaeological Perspective on Blacksmithing and Pipe Smoking.” Northeast Historical Archaeology 29:83–106. · DOI
  18. 2004 Neither Plain Nor Simple. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  19. Starbuck, David R., and Margaret Supplee Smith, eds. 1979 Historical Survey of Canterbury Shaker Village. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
  20. Starbuck, David R., and Scott T. Swank 1998 A Shaker Family Album: Photographs from the Collection of Canterbury Shaker Village. University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire.
  21. Stein, Stephen J. 1992 The Shaker Experience in America. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
  22. Swank, Scott T. 1999 Shaker Life, Art, and Architecture. Abbeville Press, New York.
  23. Wergland, Glendyne R. 2006 One Shaker Life: Isaac Newton Youngs, 1793–1865. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.
  24. Wittenstein, Kate 1979 “Shakers and Society: Theory and Practice of the Equality of the Sexes in the Nineteenth Century.” In Historical Survey of Canterbury Shaker Village, edited by D. R. Starbuck and M. S. Smith, pp. 215–227. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Starbuck, D. R., & Dennis, P. J.
Venue
Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes
Published
2010
Pages
233-249
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review