Cited by 18Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationChromosomal and Genetic VariationsNematode management and characterization studies

The nematode story: Hox gene loss and rapid evolution

Aboobaker, Aziz, Blaxter, Mark·2010·Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Abstract

The loss in some taxa of conserved developmental control genes that are present in the vast majority of animal lineages is an understudied phenomenon. It is likely that in those lineages in which loss has occurred it may be a strong signal of the mode, tempo and direction of developmental evolution and thus identify ways of generating morphological novelties. Intuitively we might expect these novelties to be particularly those associated with morphological simplifications. One striking example of this has occurred within the nematodes. It appears that over half the ancestral bilaterian Hox cluster has been lost from the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans and its closest related species. Studying the Hox gene complement of nematodes across the phylum has shown that many, if not all these losses occurred within the phylum. Other nematode clades only distantly related to C. elegans have additional Hox genes orthologous to those present in the ancestral bilaterian but absent from the model nematode. In some of these cases rapid sequence evolution of the homeodomain itself obscures orthology assignment until comparison is made with sequences from multiple nematode clades with slower evolving Hox genes. Across the phylum the homeodomains of the Hox genes that are present are evolving very rapidly. In one particular case the genomic arrangement of two homeodomains suggests a mechanism for gene loss. Studying the function in nematodes of the Hox genes absent from C. elegans awaits…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4419-6673-5_7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hox genes are not required for embryonic development of organisms that use fixed cell lineages for specification, such as C. elegans, sea urchins, and Ciona.

    “hox genes are not required for embryonic development of organisms that utilize fixed cell lineages for specification (Davidson, 1990), e.g., in C. elegans which lacks both a coherent hox complex and many hox genes (Aboobaker and Blaxter, 2010); in sea urchins (Martinez et al., 1999); or in Ciona, which also lacks a coherent hox complex (Ikuta et al., 2010).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Aboobaker and Blaxter, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aboobaker, A., & Blaxter, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Aboobaker, Aziz
Venue
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
Published
2010
Volume
689
Pages
101-110
ISSN
0065-2598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1549456757
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in experimental medicine and biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/E01030X/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Nematode management and characterization studies
Keywords
Caenorhabditis elegans, nematodes, evolutionary developmental biology, morphological novelty, orthology, synthetic gene circuits, nematode model
MeSH terms
Animals, Genes, Homeobox, Multigene Family, Nematoda, Phylogeny, Urochordata, Genes, Helminth, Homeodomain Proteins, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review