Privacy in Multimedia Communications: Protecting Users, Not Just Data
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensitivity of personal information cannot be classified a priori, as it depends on the information receiver, context, costs and benefits.
“However, the sensitivity of personal information cannot be classified a priori as it depends on the information receiver, context, costs and benefits.”
From The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design (2005) · cites this paper as Adams & Sasse, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Self-citationPrivacy Awareness: A Means to Solve the Privacy Paradox?
Pötzsch, S. (2009) · IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03315-5_17 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Challenges and Progress in Using Social Media for Health
Munson, S. A., Cavusoglu, H., Frisch, L., & Fels, S. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2792 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Multimodal interaction, interfaces, and analytics
Oviatt, S. (2022) · Handbook of Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27648-9_22-1 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adams, A., & Angela Sasse, M.
- Affiliations
- Middlesex University London (GB)
- ORCID
- Adams, Anne
- Venue
- People and Computers XV—Interaction without Frontiers
- Publisher
- Springer London
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 49-64
- OpenAlex
- W2110862792
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 26.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- privacy, multimedia communication, privacy risks, privacy trade-offs, user data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
