Cited by 57Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Sociotechnical Challenges and Progress in Using Social Media for Health

Open access
Munson, Sean A, Cavusoglu, Hasan, Frisch, Larry, Fels, Sidney·2013·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

Social media tools that connect patients, caregivers, and health providers offer great potential for helping people access health advice, receive and give social support, manage or cope with chronic conditions, and make day-to-day health decisions. These systems have seen widespread adoption, but often fail to support the goals as fully as designers and users would like. Through Ackerman's lens of the "sociotechnical gap" and computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) as a science of the artificial, we review contemporary sociotechnical challenges and progress for using social media to support health. These challenges include a tension between privacy and sharing, policy information credibility, accessibility, and tailoring in social spaces. Those studying, building, deploying, and using social media systems to further health goals will benefit from approaching this work by borrowing from Ackerman's framing of CSCW. In particular, this requires acknowledgment that technical systems will not fully meet our social goals, and then adopting design and educational approaches that are appropriate to fill this gap, building less-nuanced systems as partial solutions and tools for advancing our understanding, and by working with the CSCW research community to develop and pursue key lines of inquiry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.2792

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns about online searching, privacy, and professionalism have been suggested as barriers to doctors' use of social media.

    “While concerns about online searching [22,23], privacy [24], and professionalism [25] have been suggested as barriers to the use of social media by doctors, the slow adoption of social media also represents a possible lost opportunity for the medical profession at large to engage with patients and the general community.”

    From How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey (2014) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Health care organizations experience barriers regarding privacy, confidentiality, reputation management, and the dissemination of inaccurate health information.

    “Health care organizations also experience barriers regarding privacy, confidentiality, reputation management, and the dissemination of inaccurate health information [55-57].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [33]Nissenbaum H Privacy as Contextual Integrity Washington Law Review 2004 79 1 101 139
  2. [59]Aleem U Master Thesis 2012 2013-09-30 University of British Columbia Exploring the influence of privacy management tools on online information sharing decision https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/43340
  3. [61]Bulgurcu B Understanding the information privacy-related perceptions and behaviors of an online social network user (PhD Thesis) 2012 2013-09-30 University of British Columbia The Roles of Permission Requests and Privacy Controls in Shaping a User’s Primary Appraisal and Use Intentions: An Empirical Study on Facebook Applications https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/43380
  4. [91]Aakhus M Understanding the Socio-Technical Gap: A case of GDSS Facilitation 2004 Second International Conference on Action in Language, Organisations, and Information Systems 17-18 March 2004 Linköping, Sweden 137 148

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munson, S. A., Cavusoglu, H., Frisch, L., & Fels, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Munson, Sean A
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2013-10-22
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
e226
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964745528
Cited by
57
References
86
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
computer-supported cooperative work, information credibility, accessibility, personalization, social support, chronic disease management, health data sharing, socio-technical design
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, British Columbia, Chronic Disease, Decision Making, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Social Support, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review