BUILD-IT: a computer vision-based interaction technique for a planning tool
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interfaces with various input modes and tactile interaction require powerful computer vision methods.
“This demanded a user interface able to interpret a wide range of human expressions.Such interfaces need powerful computer vision methods (Rauterberg et al., 1997b).”
From Physical and Virtual Tools: Activity Theory Applied to the Design of Groupware (2002) · cites this paper as Rauterberg et al., 1997b
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical and Virtual Tools: Activity Theory Applied to the Design of Groupware
Fjeld, M., Lauche, K., Bichsel, M., Voorhorst, F., Krueger, H., & Rauterberg, M. (2002) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1015269228596 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rauterberg, M., Fjeld, M., Krueger, H., Bichsel, M., Leonhardt, U., & Meier, M.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- People and Computers XII
- Publisher
- Springer London
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 303-314
- OpenAlex
- W1837618888
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- natural user interfaces, augmented reality, video-based interaction, planning instruments, construction planning, facility layout, virtual reality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review