CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 59Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Student Engagement: The Development of a Scale for Formative Use

Darr, Charles W.·2012·Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1999). ACER QUEST: The interactive test analysis system. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  2. Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2007). Te Kötahitanga Phase 3 Whanaungatanga: Establishing a culturally responsive pedagogy of relations in mainstream secondary school classrooms. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  4. Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland Publishing.
  6. Dinahm, S., & Rowe, K. (2007). Teaching and learning in middle schooling: A review of the literature. A report prepared for the Ministry of Education. Wellington, New Zealand: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  7. Libbey, H. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of School Health, 74, 7. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Martin, A. J. (2009). The motivation and engagement scale. Sydney, Australia: Lifelong Achievement Group. Retrieved from http://www.lifelongachievement.com · DOI
  9. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum for English-medium teaching and learning in years 1–13. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
  10. National Research Council and the Institute of Measurement. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Committee on increasing high school students’ engagement and motivation to learn. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioural and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
  11. Ng, L. (2006). Attendance, absence and truancy in New Zealand schools in 2006. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
  12. Wright, B., & Masters, G. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 59

Metadata

Authors
Darr, C. W.
Affiliations
New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZ)
Corresponding author
Darr, Charles W.
Venue
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
Pages
707-723
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34
OpenAlex
W39046818
Cited by
59
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
student engagement, self-report measures, scale development, Rasch measurement, formative assessment, high school students, instrument validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Student Engagement: The Development of a Scale for Formative Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34
The paper
Darr, C. W. (2012). Measuring Student Engagement: The Development of a Scale for Formative Use. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_34