The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in Meta-Analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A sufficient number of studies (k > 1; Pigott, 2012) were identified to calculate aggregate effect sizes for self-harm and suicidal ideation outcomes in RCTs, CCTs, and pre-post evaluations.”
From Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as Pigott, 2012
In the citing paper
“As found by (Pigott 2012) in a comparison of dissertations to their later published versions, non-significant outcomes were 30 % less likely to be in the published versions.”
From Effects of after-school programs with at-risk youth on attendance and externalizing behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015) · cites this paper as Pigott 2012
Citations
Cites
Interpolation and Extrapolation
Howard, J. P. (2017) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315120195-4 · Cited by 26
Missing Data in Meta-analysis: Strategies and Approaches
Pigott, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5_7 · Cited by 8
Self-citationGeneralizations from Meta-analysis
Pigott, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5_9 · Cited by 3
Self-citationPower Analysis for Categorical Moderator Models of Effect Size
Pigott, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5_6 · Cited by 2
Self-citationIncluding Individual Participant Data in Meta-analysis
Pigott, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5_8 · Cited by 1
Self-citationRecommendations for Producing a High Quality Meta-analysis
Pigott, T. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2278-5_10 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0032968 · Cited by 1,342
A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention.
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000088 · Cited by 1,047
Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616635612 · Cited by 983
“Moderators are variables that may explain why different studies show different results (Pigott, 2012).”
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 · Cited by 870
Bullying and Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis
Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1864 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- Pigott, T. D.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pigott, Terri D.
- ORCID
- Pigott, Terri D.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2012
- OpenAlex
- W1574663401
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.57
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- meta-analysis, evidence synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
