Cited by 870Online and Blended LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingEducational Technology and E-Learning

A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied

Bernard, Robert M., Borokhovski, Eugene, Schmid, Richard F., Tamim, Rana M., Abrami, Philip C.·2014·Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research supports higher achievement in blended learning than in face-to-face learning, with moderating effects from variables such as computer support, interaction treatments, and STEM versus non-STEM disciplines.

    “More recently, the focus has shifted to the comparison of blended and face-to-face learning, with results supporting higher achievement in blended learning (Bernard, Borokhovski, Schmid, Tamim, & Abrami, 2014; Vo, Zhu, & Diep, 2017) and a moderating effect of different variables, such as the kind of computer support used, interaction treatments or whether the courses belong to STEM or non-STEM”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Zayed University (AE)
Corresponding author
Bernard, Robert M.
Venue
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2014-02-09
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
87-122
ISSN
  • 1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-1233
OpenAlex
W1977055232
Cited by
870
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 126 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9
FWCI
21.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
blended learning, technology integration, higher education, distance education, online learning, classroom teaching, academic performance, IT support, cognitive support, meta-analysis methodology, educational technology effectiveness, student-student interaction, student-teacher interaction, learner-content interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review