Cited by 2,210Multi-Criteria Decision MakingOptimization and Mathematical ProgrammingStrategic Planning and Analysis

Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Saaty, Thomas L., Vargas, Luis G.·2012·International Series in Operations Research & Management Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The consistency ratio CR is interpreted as a continuous reliability signal; lower CR values indicate stronger internal agreement and higher confidence in structured evaluation.

    “Beyond binary filtering, we further interpret the CR as a continuous reliability signal [16,24]. Lower CR values indicate stronger internal agreement among pairwise comparisons and thus higher confidence in the structured evaluation.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012
ISSN
0884-8289 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1506366602
Cited by
2,210
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 153 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 176 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 113 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 95 · 2012: 70
FWCI
49.45
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
Keywords
analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision making, multi-objective decision making, decision models, pairwise comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review