Cited by 53Psychedelics and Drug StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and care

Use of the Classic Hallucinogen Psilocybin for Treatment of Existential Distress Associated with Cancer

Grob, Charles S., Bossis, Anthony P., Griffiths, Roland R.·2013·Psychological Aspects of Cancer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-4866-2_17

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grob, C. S., Bossis, A. P., & Griffiths, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Grob, Charles S.
Venue
Psychological Aspects of Cancer
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2012-11-03
Pages
291-308
OpenAlex
W99126694
Cited by
53
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
psilocybin, existential suffering, cancer, demoralization, psychedelic therapy, anxiety, drug regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review