Cited by 4Polymer crystallization and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-Assemblynanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

Nanodroplet Formations in Electrospun Fibers of Immiscible Polymer Blends and Their Effects on Fractionated Crystallization

Zhong, Ganji, Zhu, Lei, Fong, Hao·2013·Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4614-9472-0_2

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As-spun polymer blend fibers usually display co-continuous morphology and break into nanodroplets through thermal annealing above the Tg of the matrix due to Plateau-Rayleigh instability.

    “As-spun polymer blend fibers usually display co-continuous morphology and break into nanodroplets through thermal annealing at temperatures above the T g of the matrix due to Plateau-Rayleigh instability.”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

  • In electrospun PEO/PS (30/70) blend fibers, when annealing temperature is below 95°C, the majority crystallizes heterogeneously at around 40°C; when annealing temperature is above 125°C, fibers break into numerous nanodroplets and homogeneous/surface-induced nucleation at large undercooling dominates due to lack of heterogeneities.

    “When the annealing temperature is below 95 °C, the temperature is not enough to break the largest part of the electrospun fibers, therefore, the majority of PEO/PS blend will crystallize heterogeneously at around 40 °C ( Fig. 10 A).However, when the annealing temperature is above 125 °C, PEO/PS blend fibers break into numerous nanodroplets and homogeneous/surface-induced nucleation at large under”

    From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhong, G., Zhu, L., & Fong, H.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Nanoscale Science and Technology
Published
2013
Pages
25-50
ISSN
  • 2195-2159 (ISSN-L)
  • 2195-2167
OpenAlex
W135754514
Cited by
4
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in nanoscale science and technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Keywords
electrospun nanofibers, immiscible polymer blends, fractional crystallization, homogeneous nucleation, Rayleigh-Plateau instability, annealing, semicrystalline polymers, polyvinylidene fluoride, poly(ethylene oxide), polyethylene, polypropylene, nanoconfinement, crystal morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review