Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 388Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predator-Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record

·2003·Topics in Geobiology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Venue
Topics in Geobiology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2003
ISSN
0275-0120 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9
OpenAlex
W359589855
Cited by
388
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
FWCI
15.48
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Topics in geobiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
predator-prey interactions, fossil record, trilobites, malformations, Cretaceous, Cambrian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predator-Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9
The paper
Predator-Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record. (2003). Topics in Geobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0161-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.