Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ELECTRE and PROMETHEE methods are very similar.
“these methods (ELECTRE and PROMETHEE) are very similar (according to Belton and Stewart [4])”
From Finding the Adequate Location Scenario After the Merger of Fire Brigades Thanks to Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Methods (2018) · cites this paper as Belton and Stewart [4]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., & Schapire, R. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772758 · Cited by 2,562 · see citing works
Al-Breiki, M., & Bicer, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123481 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods for Integrated Rehabilitation Prioritization
Tscheikner-Gratl, F., Egger, P., Rauch, W., & Kleidorfer, M. (2017) · Water · doi:10.3390/w9020068 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Marazzi, L., Loiselle, S., Anderson, L. G., Rocliffe, S., & Winton, D. J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236410 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Consumption-oriented policy instruments for fostering greenhouse gas mitigation
Grubb, M., Crawford-Brown, D., Neuhoff, K., Schanes, K., Hawkins, S., & Poncia, A. (2020) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2020.1730151 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Medical Shared Decision Making with a Virtual Agent
Zhang, Z., & Bickmore, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents · doi:10.1145/3267851.3267883 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Lienert, J., Andersson, J. C. M., Hofmann, D., Silva Pinto, F., & Kuller, M. (2022) · Hydrology and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/hess-26-2899-2022 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Aldabbas, M., Venteicher, F., Gerber, L., & Widmer, M. (2018) · Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences · doi:10.1515/fcds-2018-0006 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Thanks to an exploitation procedure, described in details in Belton and Stewart [4], two initial rankings of the alternatives (called preorders) are established.”
MethodInfluential
- Authors
- Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- ORCID
- Stewart, Theodor J.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2002
- OpenAlex
- W59413458
- Cited by
- 2,659
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 213 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 139 · 2018: 154 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 129 · 2014: 122 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 104
- FWCI
- 20.15
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
- Keywords
- multi-criteria decision making, decision aids, conflicting objectives, compromise, consensus, management science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
