Cited by 2,562Recommender Systems and TechniquesAdvanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation

Open access
Li, Lihong, Chu, Wei, Langford, John, Schapire, Robert E.·2010·Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web

Abstract

Personalized web services strive to adapt their services (advertisements, news articles, etc.) to individual users by making use of both content and user information. Despite a few recent advances, this problem remains challenging for at least two reasons. First, web service is featured with dynamically changing pools of content, rendering traditional collaborative filtering methods inapplicable. Second, the scale of most web services of practical interest calls for solutions that are both fast in learning and computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1772690.1772758

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of parameter selection has recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community in the context of multi-armed bandit problems.

    “The problem of parameter selection has recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community in the context of multi-armed bandit problems [76], [77], [78].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

16 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., & Schapire, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Yahooo! Labs, Santa Clara, CA, USA
  • Yahoo (United States) (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-04-26
Pages
661-670
OpenAlex
W2112420033
Cited by
2,562
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 197 · 2025: 164 · 2024: 171 · 2023: 212 · 2022: 211 · 2021: 317 · 2020: 312 · 2019: 260 · 2018: 177 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 41
FWCI
31.45
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
personalized news recommendation, contextual bandits, personalized web services, collaborative filtering limitations, scalable learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review