The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimentation in Software Engineering
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862
Self-citationSelecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research
Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., & Damian, D. (2008) · Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11 · Cited by 1,167
Experimental perspectives on learning from imbalanced data
Van Hulse, J., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., & Napolitano, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning · doi:10.1145/1273496.1273614 · Cited by 786
Arcuri, A., & Briand, L. (2014) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.1486 · Cited by 622
Abbes, M., Khomh, F., Gueheneuc, Y.-G., & Antoniol, G. (2011) · 2011 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering · doi:10.1109/csmr.2011.24 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A.
- Venue
- The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2000
- ISSN
- 1384-6469 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229772528
- Cited by
- 1,776
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.06
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimentation in Software Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4615-4625-2
- The paper
- Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2000). Experimentation in Software Engineering. The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4625-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
