Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many overviews and guiding literature for SE researchers do not even include grounded theory.
“Many overviews and guiding literature for SE researchers do not even include grounded theory (cf. [27, 77]).”
From Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
The Nature of Theory in Information Systems1
Gregor, S. (2006) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148742 · Cited by 3,306 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9102-8 · Cited by 3,862 · see citing works
Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., & Kuzniarz, L. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,669 · see citing works
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2019) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.006 · Cited by 831 · see citing works
Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines
Stol, K.-J., Ralph, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2016) · Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2884781.2884833 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
Cico, O., Jaccheri, L., Nguyen-Duc, A., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2020.110736 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Towards MLOps: A Framework and Maturity Model
John, M. M., Olsson, H. H., & Bosch, J. (2021) · 2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) · doi:10.1109/seaa53835.2021.00050 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Aligning software engineering education with industrial needs: A meta-analysis
Garousi, V., Giray, G., Tüzün, E., Catal, C., & Felderer, M. (2019) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.044 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
How do professionals perceive legacy systems and software modernization?
Khadka, R., Batlajery, B. V., Saeidi, A. M., Jansen, S., & Hage, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2568225.2568318 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective
Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., & Ford, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3503508 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Knowledge-based approaches in software documentation: A systematic literature review
Ding, W., Liang, P., Tang, A., & van Vliet, H. (2014) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.008 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
The sky is not the limit: multitasking across GitHub projects
Vasilescu, B., Blincoe, K., Xuan, Q., Casalnuovo, C., Damian, D., Devanbu, P., & Filkov, V. (2016) · Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2884781.2884875 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationSustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review
Peters, A.-K., Capilla, R., Coroamă, V. C., Heldal, R., Lago, P., Leifler, O., Moreira, A., Fernandes, J. P., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3639060 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Application of knowledge-based approaches in software architecture: A systematic mapping study
Li, Z., Liang, P., & Avgeriou, P. (2013) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.11.005 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Human Values in Software Engineering: Contrasting Case Studies of Practice
Hussain, W., Perera, H., Whittle, J., Nurwidyantoro, A., Hoda, R., Shams, R. A., & Oliver, G. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3038802 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Prioritization based taxonomy of DevOps security challenges using PROMETHEE
Rafi, S., Yu, W., Akbar, M. A., Alsanad, A., & Gumaei, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2998819 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
An Interview Study on Sustainability Concerns in Software Development Projects
Groher, I., & Weinreich, R. (2017) · 2017 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) · doi:10.1109/seaa.2017.70 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Older adults and hackathons: a qualitative study
Kopeć, W., Balcerzak, B., Nielek, R., Kowalik, G., Wierzbicki, A., & Casati, F. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9565-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Codepori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology
Rasheed, Z., Malik, S., Kemell, K.-K., Muhammad, W., Saari, M., Systä, K., & Abrahamsson, P. (2024) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4979510 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
I heart hacker news: expanding qualitative research findings by analyzing social news websites
Barik, T., Johnson, B., & Murphy-Hill, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/2786805.2803200 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
A disruptive research playbook for studying disruptive innovations
Storey, M.-A., Russo, D., Novielli, N., Kobayashi, T., & Wang, D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3678172 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationGovernance in Practice: How Open Source Projects Define and Document Roles
Oliveira, P., Conte, T., Gerosa, M., & Steinmacher, I. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3794860.3794911 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., & Damian, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- National Research Council Canada (CA)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- Venue
- Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering
- Publisher
- Springer London
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 285-311
- OpenAlex
- W397180395
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 51.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- empirical software engineering, research methodology selection, research methodology, data collection, research questions, method comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review