Cited by 1,167Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research

Easterbrook, Steve, Singer, Janice, Storey, Margaret-Anne, Damian, Daniela·2008·Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_11

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., & Damian, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2008
Pages
285-311
OpenAlex
W397180395
Cited by
1,167
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 48
FWCI
51.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
empirical software engineering, research methodology selection, research methodology, data collection, research questions, method comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review