CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Should Historical Archaeologists Study Capitalism?: The Logic of Question and Answer and the Challenge of Systemic Analysis

Wylie, Alison·1999·Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Ascher, R. 1974 Tin*Can Archaeology, Historical Archaeology. 7.1:7–16. · DOI
  2. Beaudry, M. C. 1993 Public Aesthetics versus Personal Experience: Worker Health and Well-Being in 19th-century Lowell, Massachusetts. Historical Archaeology 27.3:90–105. · DOI
  3. Beaudry, M. C. 1996 Reinventing Historical Archaeology. In Historical Archaeology and the Study of American Culture, edited by L. A. De Cunzo and B. L. Herman, pp. 473–497. Winterthur Museum, Winterthur, Delaware, distributed by University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
  4. Binford, L. R. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217–225. · DOI
  5. Binford, L. R. 1977 General Introduction. In For Theory Building in Archaeology, edited by L. R. Binford, pp. 1–13. Academic Press, New York.
  6. Binford, L. R. 1982 Objectivity—Explanation—Archaeology—1981. In Theory and Explanation in Archaeology, edited by C. Renfrew, M. J. Rowlands, and B. A. Segraves, pp. 125–138. Academic Press, New York.
  7. Binford, L. R. 1983 Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.
  8. Binford, L. R., and J. A. Sabloff 1982 Paradigms, Systematics, and Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Research 38:137–153. · DOI
  9. Caulfield, M. D. 1974 Imperialism, the Family, and Cultures of Resistance. Socialist Revolution 4.2:67–85.
  10. Collingwood, R. G. 1939 An Autobiography. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  11. Collingwood, R. G. 1946 The Idea of History. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  12. Daniels, Norman 1979 Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76:256–282. · DOI
  13. Deagan, K. 1982 Avenues of Inquiry in Historical Archaeology. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, edited by M. B. Schiffer, pp. 151–177. Academic Press, New York. · DOI
  14. Deagan, K. 1988 Neither History nor Prehistory: The Questions that Count in Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 22.1:7–12. · DOI
  15. Deagan, K. 1990 Accommodation and Resistance: The Process and Impact of Spanish Colonization in the Southeast. In Columbian Consequences, Vol. 2, edited by D. H. Thomas, pp. 297–314. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C.
  16. Engels, F. 1942 The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. International Publishers, New York.
  17. Fritz, J. M. 1972 Archaeological Systems for Indirect Observation of the Past. In Contemporary Archaeology, edited by M. P. Leone, pp. 135–157. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
  18. Fuss, D. 1989 Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature and Difference. Routledge, New York.
  19. Geertz, C. 1973 Thick Description: Toward and Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures, pp. 3–30. Basic Books, New York.
  20. Geertz, C. 1979 From the Native’s Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. In Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, edited by P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan, pp. 225–242. University of California Press, Berkeley. · DOI
  21. Hall, M. 1984 The Burden of Tribalism: The Social Context of Southern African Iron Age Studies. American Antiquity 49.3:455–467. · DOI
  22. Handsman, R. G. 1989 Native Americans and an Archaeology of Living Traditions. Artifacts: The American Indian Archaeological Institute 17.2:3–5.
  23. Handsman, R. G. 1990 The Weantinock Indian Homeland Was Not a “Desert.” Artifacts: The American Indian Archaeological Institute 18.2:3–7.
  24. Handsman, R. G., and T. L. Richmond 1995 Confronting Colonialism: The Mahican and Schaghticoke Peoples and Us. In Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, edited by P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson, pp. 87–118. School of American Research, Santa Fe.
  25. Hodder, I. (editor) 1982 Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  26. Hodder, I. (editor) 1987 Archaeology as Long-Term History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  27. Hodder, I. 1986 Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  28. Kosso, P. 1989 Science and Objectivity. Journal of Philosophy 86:245–257. · DOI
  29. Kosso, P. 1992 Observation of the Past. History and Theory 31.1:21–36. · DOI
  30. Lenin, V. I. 1975 Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Foreign Languages Press, Peking.
  31. Leone, M. P. 1981 The Relationship Between Archaeology and the Public in Outdoor History Museums. Annals of the New York Academy of the Sciences 376:301–314. · DOI
  32. Leone, M. P. 1982 Some Opinions about Recovering Mind. American Antiquity 47:742–760. · DOI
  33. Leone, M. P., and C. A. Crosby 1987 Epilogue: Middle-Range Theory in Historical Archaeology. In Consumer Choice in Historical Archaeology, edited by S. M. Spencer-Wood, pp. 397–410. Plenum Press, New York. · DOI
  34. Leone, M. P., and P. B. Potter 1988 Issues in Historical Archaeology. In The Recovery of Meaning, edited by M. P. Leone and P. B. Potter, pp. 1–22. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  35. Marx. K. 1970 A Critique of Political Economy (introduction). Reprinted in C. J. Arthur, The German Ideology Part I, International Publishing, New York.
  36. Mills, C. W. 1959 The Sociological Imagination. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  37. Orser, C. E. 1988 Toward a Theory of Power for Historical Archaeology: Plantations and Space. In The Recovery of Meaning, edited by Mark P. Leone and Parker B. Potter, pp. 313–343. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  38. Patrik, L. E. 1985 Is There an Archaeological Record? In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Volume 8, edited by M. B. Schiffer, pp. 27–62. Academic Press, New York. · DOI
  39. Potter, P. B. 1991 What is the Use of Plantation Archaeology? Historical Archaeology 25.3:94–107. · DOI
  40. Purser, M. 1991 Several Paradise Ladies are Visiting in Town: Gender Strategies in the Early Industrial West. Historical Archaeology 25.4:6–16. · DOI
  41. Rawls, J. 1971 A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Schuyler, R. L. 1978 Emergence and Definition of a New Discipline. In Historical Archaeology: A Guide to Substantive and Theoretical Contributions, edited by Robert L. Schuyler, pp. 1–2. Baywood, Farmingdale, New York.
  43. Schmidt, P. R. 1995 Using Archaeology to Remake History in Africa. In Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, edited by P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson, pp. 119–148. School of American Research, Santa Fe. Schmidt, P. R., and T. C. Patterson (editors)
  44. Schmidt, P. R. 1995 Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings. School of American Research, Santa Fe.
  45. Seifert, D. J. (editor) 1991 Gender in Historical Archaeology. Special issue, Historical Archaeology 25.4. Singleton, T. A. (editor) · DOI
  46. Seifert, D. J. 1985 The Archaeology of Slavery and Plantation Life. Academic Press, New York.
  47. Smith, B. H. 1991 Belief and Resistance: A Symmetrical Account. Critical Inquiry 18:125–139. · DOI
  48. Thomas, D. H. 1991 Cubist Perspective on the Spanish Borderlands: Past, Present, and Future. In Columbian Consequences: The Spanish Borderlands in Pan-American Perspective, Volume 3, edited by David Hurst Thomas, pp. xiii–xix. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  49. Trigger, B. G. 1980 Archaeology and the Image of the American Indian. American Antiquity 45: 662–676. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Trigger, B. G. 1989a History and Contemporary American Archaeology: A Critical Analysis. In Archaeological Thought in America, edited by C.C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, pp. 19–34.
  51. Trigger, B. G. University of Cambridge, Cambridge. 1989b Hyperrelativism, Responsibility and the Social Sciences. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 26:776–797.
  52. Trigger, B. G. 1991 Early Native North American Responses to European Contact: Romantic versus Rationalistic Interpretations. Journal of American History 4:1195–1215. · DOI
  53. Vargas, I. A. 1995 The Perception of History and Archaeology in Latin America: A Theoretical Approach. In Making Alternative Histories: The Practice of Archaeology and History in Non-Western Settings, edited by P. R. Schmidt and T. C. Patterson, pp. 47–68. School of American Research, Santa Fe.
  54. Wylie, A. 1989 Archaeological Cables and Tacking: The Implications of Practice for Bernstein’s “Options Beyond Objectivism and Relativism.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19: 1–18. · DOI
  55. Trigger, B. G. 1992 Reasoning About Ourselves; Feminist Methodology in the Social Sciences. In Women and Reason, edited by Elizabeth Harvey and Kathleen Okruhlik, pp. 225–244. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  56. Trigger, B. G. 1993 Invented Lands/Discovered Pasts: The Westward Expansion of Myth and History. Historical Archaeology 27.4:1–19. · DOI
  57. Trigger, B. G. 1996 The Constitution of Archaeological Evidence: Gender Politics and Science. In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, edited by Peter Galison and David J. Stump, pp. 311–343. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  58. Trigger, B. G. 1991b Access and Space, Symbolic and Material, in Historical Archaeology. In The Archaeology of Gender, Proceedings of the 1989 Chacmool Conference, edited by Dale Walde and Noreen D. Willows, pp. 252–262. The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Wylie, A.
Venue
Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
1999
Pages
23-50
ISSN
1574-0439
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_2
Cited by
23
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Should Historical Archaeologists Study Capitalism?: The Logic of Question and Answer and the Challenge of Systemic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_2
The paper
Wylie, A. (1999). Why Should Historical Archaeologists Study Capitalism?: The Logic of Question and Answer and the Challenge of Systemic Analysis. Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4767-9_2